| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:06 |
 neon1024 |
Guess it’s a use-case I’ve not encountered yet |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:06 |
neon1024 |
Not sure why I’d ever want to do that :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:06 |
hmic |
exactly |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:05 |
neon1024 |
So you mean I could catch \MyThingy\Exception in a different way to \Exception? |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:05 |
neon1024 |
Sounds like I’ve got a gap in my knowledge here |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:04 |
hmic |
that only works this way |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:04 |
neon1024 |
The only possible reason I can think of is that if you want to change your exception, you don’t need to change it in all the places you’ve implemented it |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:04 |
hmic |
because you might not want to catch any invalid argument in the chain of things, but only the one in your namespace |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:04 |
neon1024 |
I don’t see the point of doing that when \InvalidArgumentException works just fine |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:03 |
hmic |
why you'd do that: import it to the current namespace. |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:03 |
neon1024 |
No, that’s me selecting the root one because I don’t see the point of the others |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:03 |
hmic |
obviously the autocomplete is smart enough to sujggest the current namespace first |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:03 |
neon1024 |
Still doesn’t answer my question. |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:03 |
hmic |
neon1024: yes, you decide the correct namespace to use |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:02 |
neon1024 |
Great @hmic, then you end up here, http://i.imgur.com/3fnP1wp.png |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:02 |
spencdev |
Hmm, I had this same issue myself about 3 days ago. When I created an index for the column it went away |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:02 |
hmic |
additionally, you dont need the joins on the count at all if you do not filter anyways. just drop them! |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:01 |
hmic |
there is going something completely wrong, as 400k records is really not much |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:00 |
hmic |
diego182: check if they get used by telling mysql to explain your queries |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:00 |
hmic |
neon1024: it imports it to the namespace |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 14:00 |
diego182 |
yes, it does |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:58 |
spencdev |
@diego182 does your table have an index for the joins? |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:52 |
diego182 |
to have a faster query |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:50 |
neon1024 |
I don’t see why you’d do that |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:50 |
neon1024 |
Can anyone tell me why this exists? https://github.com/php-fig/log/blob/master/Psr/Log/InvalidArgumentException.php |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:46 |
slackebot |
have something like this: ``` SELECT ( COUNT(*) ) AS `count` FROM message_board MessageBoard LEFT JOIN users ``` |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:46 |
slackebot |
website, I've tried to make a count with only messages (as its a left join, it would be ok), and the result is much faster, is there somehow generate the count for the paginator component? the query generated query is: ``` SELECT ( COUNT(*) ) AS `count` FROM message_board MessageBoard LEFT JOIN users Users ON Users.id = (MessageBoard.user_id) LEFT JOIN users Friends ON Friends.id = ( MessageBoard.destination_user_id ) ``` What |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:46 |
diego182 |
Hello all, I have a MySQL table with storage Engine InnoDB and it has arround ~400000 records on it, this table is a message table and has 2 fk with the users table, one for origin user, other for destination user, I'm running on PHP 7 and MySQL 5.7, the associations are loaded with LEFT join. My problem is that the count query needed due to pagination is really slow, it takes about something between 5 and 10 seconds to be done, so its slo |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:33 |
neon1024 |
Just an out-loud question really. Is there a convention for indenting return lines in a docblock if the line runs over the character limit of the line. I see some places a single tab indent to show it’s a continuation of the previous line. Anyone have thoughts? |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:28 |
spriz |
I saw some entities was created in the afterSave/beforeSave logic |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:28 |
spriz |
so if somewhere in the before/after save of entity A there's a failure of saving a completely "unrelated" entity - that sounds reasonable for this error |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:27 |
spriz |
Ah |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:27 |
lorenzo |
if you call save() on another table in a behavipr or after save, then it has the power to roll everything back |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:27 |
spriz |
I see! I'll see if I can find anything weird going on :) |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:26 |
lorenzo |
it can be a rules error, for example |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:26 |
lorenzo |
usually a behavior of a before/after save that had an error |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 13:18 |
spriz |
Any tips on debugging a nested transaction rollback? :thinking_face: |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 12:17 |
nicolas.r |
ty |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 12:09 |
hmic |
nicolas.r: try ->first() |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 12:03 |
nicolas.r |
Hi guys just a simple question. How can I have a single result instad toding this ; $this->Actions->findById(1)->toArray()[0] |
| # |
Jul 14th 2017, 11:43 |
neon1024 |
“The constructor for Cake\Core\Exception\Exception has been extended, allowing you to pass in hashes of data.” |
