| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:51 |
 spriz |
if you're looking for a framework, react for sure isn't the right choice (the complete "react stack" might solve it though) |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:51 |
crazycoder |
@admad i am seeing it |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:51 |
inoas |
Now use Redux (or MobX or whatever) + React + React Router + React-Select + MarxCSS and I don't see how I miss a lot |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
spriz |
like comparing CakePHP to any random composer package :thinking_face: |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
iqu |
spriz: this is just to have some idea and for a reference |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
spriz |
Angular => Framework React/Vue => Library |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
inoas |
he is doing all implementation ;p |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
inoas |
but I am doing the json backend api in cakeph p - I am just guiding my employer on the frontend redux stuff |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
spriz |
you're really comparing apples and bananas here... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:50 |
iqu |
ill give it a second try |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:49 |
inoas |
redux is - good in theory - but so far I found that it just has too much boiler plate |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:49 |
inoas |
reactjs is really really good |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:49 |
iqu |
let me check redux too. Did not like reactjs too much, but it is better than angular imo |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:49 |
inoas |
not for full blown SPAs ... then I still feel reactjs is awesome |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:49 |
inoas |
like - for small widgets on frontends |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:49 |
inoas |
maybe I want to use vuejs instead of jquery :p? |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:48 |
inoas |
is it ;)? |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:48 |
iqu |
cool |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:48 |
inoas |
iqu: no not yet |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:48 |
iqu |
inoas: did you check vuejs? |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:48 |
slackebot5 |
Action: admad hugs inoas |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:48 |
inoas |
I am completely with you |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:47 |
admad |
which is great if you want to add say a js driven widget on at page instead of a full blown js frontend |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:47 |
inoas |
I really dislike tooling burdons :( |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:46 |
inoas |
that's good |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:46 |
inoas |
didn't take a look at vue so far |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:46 |
admad |
it can also be used used directly by just including a js file without any tooling |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:46 |
inoas |
our experience with reactjs/redux so far is: reactjs/jsx = pure gem (aside the understandable annoyance of empty-string vs null) ... redux is a lot of boiler place and I am not sure the choice was so good |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:46 |
admad |
inoas: yes |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:45 |
nk-sonu |
i just kidding.. |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:45 |
Junior |
so no ideeas why the footprint plugin for the users model work but for my orders model it does not? |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:45 |
admad |
*pinging |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:45 |
inoas |
admad you mean vue is easier to grasp than angular? |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:45 |
admad |
nk-sonu: don't go about pining people individually and annoying them. If someone is interested they will answer. |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:44 |
nk-sonu |
@admad can you take a look at my issue ? i am not getting what is the issue.. @spriz looking for money ;) :P |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:44 |
iqu |
:) |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:44 |
iqu |
ok, terrible |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:43 |
admad |
"horrible" might not be the right term, but they certainly have a steeper learning curve |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:43 |
iqu |
but angular is just too much.. |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:43 |
iqu |
even reactjs is mostly horrible |
| # |
Apr 20th 2017, 12:42 |
admad |
it is a lot easier to grasp than angular :slightly_smiling_face: |