| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:31 |
savant |
and then there is cakeforge, which is still hosting random things and being linked to by members (there is some good stuff there but it's getting sort of outdated) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:31 |
savant |
and cakeqs should really replace the google groups, but you'd need to import the archive (does cakeqs integrate with the other logins?) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:30 |
savant |
then there are the google groups, which get a modest amount of traffic, but usually the same questions |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:30 |
savant |
lighthouseapp is nice, but it requires yet another account on yet another service |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:29 |
savant |
the book is well built, but needs some work to make it apparent to all users that it is a wiki and they CAN contribute |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:29 |
savant |
the bakery is a smelly turd because people post their articles and the code isn't in a repository (git, svn or otherwise) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:28 |
savant |
you have bin, which is awesome, but not tied to my user account |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:28 |
savant |
to be blunt, there are way too many disparate tools in use for the cakephp community |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:28 |
real34 |
that "non tech" decision-makers could read to see how Cake is awesome :) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:27 |
real34 |
with all official announcements and community highlights |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:27 |
real34 |
a blog on news.cakephp.org for instance |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:27 |
real34 |
I initially thought about a simple setup of Croogo for another blog (simple / efficient), but the idea of having yet another tool is not optimal |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:26 |
savant |
communication? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:25 |
real34 |
And btw, the reason why I think a bakery rewrite is needed is that 1) it would help to have one tool for all local communities / languages, 2) it would encourage share and reuse of code (but many changes are needed for this), 3) I think the CSF needs a better tool for communication, somewhat separated from the community generated content... and Predominant thinks the new Bakery could be this tool |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:24 |
savant |
so I kinda don't have any reason to keep working on this :P |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:24 |
savant |
and apparently Predominant added comment spam protection last week |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:24 |
savant |
I also needed to upgrade the app to 1.3, or at least 1.2, to get it to a point where i knew what I had to do to add comment spam (behaviors!) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
savant |
so I would not get comment spam in my email |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
savant |
to be honest, the only reason I started working on this was to add spam protection |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
savant |
okay |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
real34 |
not sure if it is a good idea or not... but we can keep it in mind |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
real34 |
also, I think I may be able to get some help from french guys as soon as we will know what is needed and how we could proceed |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:22 |
savant |
I would have jumped into the version that alkemann was working on, but the changes were varied etc |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:22 |
real34 |
I'll start by forking the repo and making it work locally |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:21 |
savant |
Predominant mentioned some notes he would give me on the supposed rewrite |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:21 |
real34 |
ok |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:21 |
savant |
i've added some changes to the AppModel to make refactoring things into the model a bit easier, as well as added 1 behavior of my own to support extended model callbacks, but other than that my work has been to make it 1.3 compatible |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:20 |
savant |
like I said, all my work is based off of the original pre-1.0 code |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:20 |
savant |
idk |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:20 |
savant |
yeah |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:19 |
real34 |
it was fixed since though |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:19 |
real34 |
__() was not used at all |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:19 |
savant |
what was developed? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
real34 |
ok, I think it was developed by the same people that initially developed cakephp.org :) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
savant |
once i've finished my first pass, i'll make the articles Translatable |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
savant |
atm just __() |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
real34 |
you said you worked on i18n in views. Is it just adding gettexts or also working on Translatable models? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:17 |
savant |
i figure if I use as much core code as possible, people should be able to figure out things and it might allow others to start working on it |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:17 |
real34 |
okay |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:17 |
savant |
thats the remaster branch in my repository |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
so I threw out his changes and started DIRECTLY from the existing code from cakeforge |