| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:26 |
savant |
communication? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:25 |
real34 |
And btw, the reason why I think a bakery rewrite is needed is that 1) it would help to have one tool for all local communities / languages, 2) it would encourage share and reuse of code (but many changes are needed for this), 3) I think the CSF needs a better tool for communication, somewhat separated from the community generated content... and Predominant thinks the new Bakery could be this tool |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:24 |
savant |
so I kinda don't have any reason to keep working on this :P |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:24 |
savant |
and apparently Predominant added comment spam protection last week |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:24 |
savant |
I also needed to upgrade the app to 1.3, or at least 1.2, to get it to a point where i knew what I had to do to add comment spam (behaviors!) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
savant |
so I would not get comment spam in my email |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
savant |
to be honest, the only reason I started working on this was to add spam protection |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
savant |
okay |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
real34 |
not sure if it is a good idea or not... but we can keep it in mind |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:23 |
real34 |
also, I think I may be able to get some help from french guys as soon as we will know what is needed and how we could proceed |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:22 |
savant |
I would have jumped into the version that alkemann was working on, but the changes were varied etc |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:22 |
real34 |
I'll start by forking the repo and making it work locally |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:21 |
savant |
Predominant mentioned some notes he would give me on the supposed rewrite |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:21 |
real34 |
ok |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:21 |
savant |
i've added some changes to the AppModel to make refactoring things into the model a bit easier, as well as added 1 behavior of my own to support extended model callbacks, but other than that my work has been to make it 1.3 compatible |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:20 |
savant |
like I said, all my work is based off of the original pre-1.0 code |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:20 |
savant |
idk |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:20 |
savant |
yeah |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:19 |
real34 |
it was fixed since though |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:19 |
real34 |
__() was not used at all |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:19 |
savant |
what was developed? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
real34 |
ok, I think it was developed by the same people that initially developed cakephp.org :) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
savant |
once i've finished my first pass, i'll make the articles Translatable |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
savant |
atm just __() |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:18 |
real34 |
you said you worked on i18n in views. Is it just adding gettexts or also working on Translatable models? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:17 |
savant |
i figure if I use as much core code as possible, people should be able to figure out things and it might allow others to start working on it |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:17 |
real34 |
okay |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:17 |
savant |
thats the remaster branch in my repository |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
so I threw out his changes and started DIRECTLY from the existing code from cakeforge |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
that makes it slightly harder for others to get in on the development |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
it's my experience that many of the cakephp developers tend to use their own extensions in apps |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
real34 |
) |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
I have NO idea what was going on in there |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
i looked at alkemann's 2.0 branch |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:16 |
savant |
no idea |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:15 |
real34 |
do you know if http://cakephp.lighthouseapp.com/projects/43066-bakery/tickets is being used? |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:15 |
real34 |
I know alkemann spent some time on the 2.0 branch and afaik the code looks clean, but I never dig deeper and tried to set it up locally |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:15 |
savant |
i think the ajax tagging needs some love, but it definitely does something. at least overwrites the current tags |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:14 |
savant |
I've not tested every admin action, although the non-admin actions (except anything involving ajax) seem to work |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:14 |
savant |
well, atm I'm fixing some issues with viewing profiles |
| # |
Apr 26th 2010, 01:14 |
savant |
haha |