Log message #1275347

# At Username Text
# Jan 27th 2010, 15:19 jose_zap maybe they are not aware of that possibility
# Jan 27th 2010, 15:13 Predominant Are people not aware they can fork the code, and submit fixes?
# Jan 27th 2010, 15:13 Predominant I've seen two people come in asking about the email thing.
# Jan 27th 2010, 03:07 ProLoser so we don't get the jarbled garbage emails?
# Jan 27th 2010, 03:07 ProLoser any chance of someone switching the email system in the bakery from txt to html?
# Jan 26th 2010, 21:39 Traveler7 Anyone mind doing this to the current bakery: http://cakephp.lighthouseapp.com/projects/43066/tickets/12-quick-fix-to-live-bakery-please-set-email-type-to-html
# Jan 17th 2010, 07:04 RJaus anyone here?
# Jan 8th 2010, 08:01 jose_zap Anyone see anything wrong with this article? : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/simple-way-to-memcache-almost-all-database-queries
# Jan 8th 2010, 08:00 jose_zap Hi! :)
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:16 ADmad brb
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:15 ADmad s/string/strange
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:15 ADmad hmm having a string issue with my isp.. http no worky.. so cant have a look
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:15 jose_zap ok
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:14 ADmad go for it then
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 jose_zap I woul publish it
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 jose_zap and the article is well written
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 jose_zap te code is clean
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 jose_zap not very sure of implementation
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 jose_zap well the mathematic logic is correct
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 ADmad i am not familiar with btree implementation so cant comment
# Jan 5th 2010, 14:11 jose_zap ADmad: what do you think of this one: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/btree-behavior
# Jan 5th 2010, 10:56 jose_zap oh, good!
# Jan 5th 2010, 10:55 ADmad btw you can check logs for this channel on irc.cakephp
# Jan 5th 2010, 10:54 jose_zap ok, I willl... It looks good
# Jan 5th 2010, 10:54 ADmad jose_zap: if the smooth translate article looks ok i guess you can publish it.. the author was discussing it with poLK and Andy so most likely the did required changes..
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:58 ProLoser it's annoying that i have to include the code myself
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:57 ProLoser i thought git handles submodules well
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:38 Predominant users is part of the book, i think
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:21 ProLoser but isn't that in the same repo?
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:20 ProLoser but it looks like it's missing the usersplugin
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:20 ProLoser okay so i switched to branch 2.0
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:11 ProLoser i need to switch to the remote 2.0 branch
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:11 ProLoser i did, the master branch is a blank app
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:10 Predominant Use the link I sent
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:10 Predominant Blank app? one sec
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:03 ProLoser grr, i'm on the wrong fork
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:01 ProLoser and weren't you guys working on some bakery 2.0?
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:01 ProLoser Predominant: i forked and cloned it, it's a blank app
# Dec 3rd 2009, 03:01 Predominant ProLoser: http://thechaw.com/bakery
# Dec 3rd 2009, 02:24 ProLoser what the hell, thechaw's project is a blank project
# Dec 3rd 2009, 02:14 ProLoser cuz it looks like the last update was january 23