| # |
Jan 27th 2010, 15:13 |
Predominant |
Are people not aware they can fork the code, and submit fixes? |
| # |
Jan 27th 2010, 15:13 |
Predominant |
I've seen two people come in asking about the email thing. |
| # |
Jan 27th 2010, 03:07 |
ProLoser |
so we don't get the jarbled garbage emails? |
| # |
Jan 27th 2010, 03:07 |
ProLoser |
any chance of someone switching the email system in the bakery from txt to html? |
| # |
Jan 26th 2010, 21:39 |
Traveler7 |
Anyone mind doing this to the current bakery: http://cakephp.lighthouseapp.com/projects/43066/tickets/12-quick-fix-to-live-bakery-please-set-email-type-to-html |
| # |
Jan 17th 2010, 07:04 |
RJaus |
anyone here? |
| # |
Jan 8th 2010, 08:01 |
jose_zap |
Anyone see anything wrong with this article? : http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/simple-way-to-memcache-almost-all-database-queries |
| # |
Jan 8th 2010, 08:00 |
jose_zap |
Hi! :) |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:16 |
ADmad |
brb |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:15 |
ADmad |
s/string/strange |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:15 |
ADmad |
hmm having a string issue with my isp.. http no worky.. so cant have a look |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:15 |
jose_zap |
ok |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:14 |
ADmad |
go for it then |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 |
jose_zap |
I woul publish it |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 |
jose_zap |
and the article is well written |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 |
jose_zap |
te code is clean |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 |
jose_zap |
not very sure of implementation |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 |
jose_zap |
well the mathematic logic is correct |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:13 |
ADmad |
i am not familiar with btree implementation so cant comment |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 14:11 |
jose_zap |
ADmad: what do you think of this one: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/btree-behavior |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 10:56 |
jose_zap |
oh, good! |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 10:55 |
ADmad |
btw you can check logs for this channel on irc.cakephp |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 10:54 |
jose_zap |
ok, I willl... It looks good |
| # |
Jan 5th 2010, 10:54 |
ADmad |
jose_zap: if the smooth translate article looks ok i guess you can publish it.. the author was discussing it with poLK and Andy so most likely the did required changes.. |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:58 |
ProLoser |
it's annoying that i have to include the code myself |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:57 |
ProLoser |
i thought git handles submodules well |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:38 |
Predominant |
users is part of the book, i think |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:21 |
ProLoser |
but isn't that in the same repo? |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:20 |
ProLoser |
but it looks like it's missing the usersplugin |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:20 |
ProLoser |
okay so i switched to branch 2.0 |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:11 |
ProLoser |
i need to switch to the remote 2.0 branch |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:11 |
ProLoser |
i did, the master branch is a blank app |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:10 |
Predominant |
Use the link I sent |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:10 |
Predominant |
Blank app? one sec |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:03 |
ProLoser |
grr, i'm on the wrong fork |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:01 |
ProLoser |
and weren't you guys working on some bakery 2.0? |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:01 |
ProLoser |
Predominant: i forked and cloned it, it's a blank app |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 03:01 |
Predominant |
ProLoser: http://thechaw.com/bakery |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 02:24 |
ProLoser |
what the hell, thechaw's project is a blank project |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 02:14 |
ProLoser |
cuz it looks like the last update was january 23 |
| # |
Dec 3rd 2009, 02:14 |
ProLoser |
is there a specific branch or anything that i should for of the bakery in thechaw? |