| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:33 |
Predominant |
Anything specific? |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:32 |
ProLoser |
i'm wondering if these updates resolved something |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:31 |
Predominant |
Whats the problem |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:30 |
Predominant |
Not personally, no. |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:30 |
ProLoser |
have you tried loading datasources from plugins with the new 1.3 solution? |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:29 |
Predominant |
Whats up? |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:28 |
ProLoser |
you knowledgable on 1.3? |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:23 |
Predominant |
yep |
| # |
Nov 14th 2009, 20:21 |
ProLoser |
anyone around? |
| # |
Nov 9th 2009, 07:14 |
cakemies4 |
Can anyone help me for building cakephp cookbook style menu ? |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:58 |
Predominant |
keeps the search engines bringing users. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:58 |
Predominant |
And its good to have articles matching releases of other related software |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:57 |
markstory |
yeah |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:57 |
Predominant |
This is very basic. But seems like it should work: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/ckeditor-3-x-new-fckeditor-version |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:56 |
Predominant |
I published something else |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:55 |
markstory |
Well I published the LDAP data source. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:55 |
Predominant |
ahh |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:55 |
markstory |
I think originally the goal was to only publish the best stuff. But I don't remember what was considered the best. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
I think as long as the article isnt a blatent advertisment for some website, and there is some decent content, we can approve it. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
But yeah, looks good. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
;-)( |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
Dec 31, 1969 |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:53 |
markstory |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/ldap-data-source-with-full-crud-support this one looks good. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:52 |
markstory |
yeah there are issues with the bakery code. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:52 |
Predominant |
epoch |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:52 |
Predominant |
a lot have epoc creation / modification times on them |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
Some of them date back to august |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
markstory |
oh my. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
58 |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
markstory |
how many are there? |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
I'm wondering if we should go through and clear out the list of pending articles |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
Okay. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:49 |
markstory |
Predominant: ^ |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:47 |
markstory |
I don't think there were ever any hard and fast rules. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:21 |
Predominant |
What are the rules for article acceptance on the bakery? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:13 |
Phally |
hehe i guess it would |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:12 |
poLK |
it is not _that_ confidential. Feature list and code itself will make more happy faces, then just this pure info. |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:11 |
Phally |
poLK: hehe good job ;) for confidential information, please pm, that saves some time :p |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:10 |
poLK |
I mean: hmm, what? logs? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:10 |
poLK |
hm, what logs? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:07 |
Phally |
hehe that i can use |