| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:57 |
Predominant |
This is very basic. But seems like it should work: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/ckeditor-3-x-new-fckeditor-version |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:56 |
Predominant |
I published something else |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:55 |
markstory |
Well I published the LDAP data source. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:55 |
Predominant |
ahh |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:55 |
markstory |
I think originally the goal was to only publish the best stuff. But I don't remember what was considered the best. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
I think as long as the article isnt a blatent advertisment for some website, and there is some decent content, we can approve it. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
But yeah, looks good. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
;-)( |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:54 |
Predominant |
Dec 31, 1969 |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:53 |
markstory |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/ldap-data-source-with-full-crud-support this one looks good. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:52 |
markstory |
yeah there are issues with the bakery code. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:52 |
Predominant |
epoch |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:52 |
Predominant |
a lot have epoc creation / modification times on them |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
Some of them date back to august |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
markstory |
oh my. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
58 |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
markstory |
how many are there? |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
I'm wondering if we should go through and clear out the list of pending articles |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:51 |
Predominant |
Okay. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:49 |
markstory |
Predominant: ^ |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:47 |
markstory |
I don't think there were ever any hard and fast rules. |
| # |
Nov 8th 2009, 18:21 |
Predominant |
What are the rules for article acceptance on the bakery? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:13 |
Phally |
hehe i guess it would |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:12 |
poLK |
it is not _that_ confidential. Feature list and code itself will make more happy faces, then just this pure info. |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:11 |
Phally |
poLK: hehe good job ;) for confidential information, please pm, that saves some time :p |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:10 |
poLK |
I mean: hmm, what? logs? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:10 |
poLK |
hm, what logs? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:07 |
Phally |
hehe that i can use |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:07 |
Phally |
markstory: there is no communication there at all, is there? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:07 |
markstory |
other than a time masheen of course :) |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:07 |
markstory |
Phally: is there anything you need from me to keep going? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:01 |
Phally |
oh and password recovery etc |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:01 |
Phally |
it needs the registration process though, but i figured messaging first, so the messaging component can be used with registration |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:00 |
markstory |
that's a good start then :) |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:00 |
markstory |
nice. |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 14:00 |
Phally |
about the bakery, i don't really know, i can tell you about the users plugin though... it has permission handling implemented as described in the spec, also has messaging... it has an auth helper and a messaging component where e-mail notifications can be built in... i know of a little bug with the naming of the config file and requestAction and perhaps the encoded cookie could be optimized... all have test cases and thats all there |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 13:56 |
markstory |
But was wondering where it reached kind of. |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 13:56 |
markstory |
just wanted to know where things were with the bakery code. I know its been dormant for a while. |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 13:56 |
Phally |
markstory: sup? |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 07:53 |
Phally |
thanks, bye |
| # |
Nov 6th 2009, 07:53 |
markstory |
have a safe trip |