Page 7 of 134, showing 100 records out of 13,394 total, starting on record 601, ending on 700
# | Username | Text | |
---|---|---|---|
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:16 | PhpNut | there is no longer moderation on articles |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:16 | savant | right |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:16 | PhpNut | I like the idea, but it could be hard to implement it properly if a user is not using the correct naming conventions etc |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:16 | savant | Quite a few articles could easily be plugins, or are plugins and havent been updated |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:15 | savant | will the files be vetted (as large != component/behavior etc) |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:15 | savant | and then? |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 22:15 | PhpNut | savant: there are plans to move large code blocks to archive files right now |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 17:06 | savant | A good example of where this would be useful is http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/interlock/2010/08/22/configure-plugin |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:54 | savant | comments? |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:54 | savant | but that is up for discussion |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:53 | savant | And what will happen if a user does not wish to attach a project to their github profile |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:53 | savant | I have not yet considered how re-translation is handled |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:53 | savant | Once it is moved over, the user can be given an opportunity to update their article, and a link to the github clone url can be added to the article automatically |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:52 | savant | upon verification of proper plugin creation, a user can be sent an email notifying them that they can clone over the plugin to their own github profile, and it would be an automated process on the bakery servers to move the code over |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:51 | savant | and packaged with the plugin (although this process would be more brittle) |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:51 | savant | the article itself might be used as a readme, and if the plugin was built correctly, those codeblocks which are classes would be removed and the article slightly updated as a readme |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:50 | savant | a notification can be raised to someone curating this - I would volunteer if no one else wishes to - who can verify that a plugin was properly generated |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:49 | savant | from there, inflecting classnames would be used to properly name files and move them into their respective paths, with any extraneous, unparsed classes going into the "libs" dir to be sorted manually |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:48 | savant | then it might be possible to use the reflection class or something to figure out what are the classes and what each codeblock is |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:47 | savant | I realize some of the articles would not be automatically parsable, but it would be useful to parse out codeblocks into individual files |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:43 | savant | I am happy to discuss any possible implementation of this, and more than happy to write the code that interacts with the Github api to implement this |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:42 | savant | and then the code would be moved to their account |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:42 | savant | An author could take control of the repository using github's api (which provides authentication and cloning services) |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:42 | savant | Each repository would contain the code on a specific bakery article |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:41 | savant | but it would be nice to be able to have a "bakery" account on github |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:41 | savant | I mentioned this at CakeFest |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 16:40 | savant | Is there a process to clean up bakery articles? |
# | Oct 10th 2010, 15:04 | Phally | e-mail address changing (for gravatar) isn´t doing anything on the bakery |
# | Oct 2nd 2010, 07:18 | teknoid | hi |
# | Oct 2nd 2010, 07:13 | styler | hi all |
# | Sep 29th 2010, 06:19 | bodik | thanks |
# | Sep 29th 2010, 06:19 | bodik | ok |
# | Sep 29th 2010, 06:19 | PhpNut | bodik: join #cakephp that is the support channel |
# | Sep 29th 2010, 05:33 | bodik | hi, anyone willing to help newbie ? ;) .. i'm trying to make simple user management application. I have 2 modesl (user,group) with HABTM relationship. i made simple activate function in user controller (http://pastebin.com/RU2y0YJj) but when i use it, any group relationship for that user gets deleted ;( |
# | Sep 19th 2010, 06:52 | kevin_ | good eve cakeists! |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:24 | danbuntu | cut and past here we come |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:24 | danbuntu | opps |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:24 | ADmad | danbuntu: wrong channel.. join #cakephp |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:22 | danbuntu | i'm guesing it should be done int he model undert the 'var $name = ' part but I don't seem to be able to get it to work |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:21 | danbuntu | how do you reorder this by a different column? |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:21 | danbuntu | in the baked /view you get a grid of information ordered by the id field |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:20 | danbuntu | can some one help me please? |
# | Sep 14th 2010, 03:20 | danbuntu | Morining all |
# | Sep 12th 2010, 11:03 | JoseLo | come on! |
# | Sep 12th 2010, 10:54 | JoseLo | no one? |
# | Sep 12th 2010, 10:51 | JoseLo | some one can help me? |
# | Sep 12th 2010, 10:50 | JoseLo | I need some help with the configuration of cake |
# | Sep 12th 2010, 10:50 | JoseLo | hi |
# | Sep 8th 2010, 21:24 | PhpNut | join #cakephp |
# | Sep 8th 2010, 21:22 | phuocdo | i tried to declare var $components = array('Session'); but it doesn't work either |
# | Sep 8th 2010, 21:22 | phuocdo | i'm gettting "Undefined property: View::$Session [APP\views\layouts\default.ctp, line 45]" error |
# | Sep 4th 2010, 16:28 | pbowers | does anybody have any recommendations how I can set up users habtm groups with auth? |
# | Aug 27th 2010, 00:04 | thedilab | Hi team, I have modified my Start Tutorial article |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:43 | thedilab_ | Thank you very much guys for feedback, I will improve the article. |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:39 | thedilab_ | i think I can do that, it is bake command has enhanced the development speed a lot |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:38 | Predominant | thedilab_: You could enhance that StartTutorial article by showing some example code, or explaining what problems CakePHP solved for you in building your site. |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:38 | thedilab_ | ok, thanks for getting back to me |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:36 | ADmad | i personally don't see any unique/interesting piece of info with regards to cakephp usage.. |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:32 | thedilab_ | ? |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:31 | thedilab_ | a case study |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:31 | thedilab_ | Introducing Star Tutorial |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:31 | thedilab_ | what about |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:30 | ADmad | i think we have enough articles about file upload components/behaviors/plugins already :) |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:28 | thedilab_ | 2 of them |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:28 | thedilab_ | File Model behavior |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:28 | thedilab_ | Introducing Star Tutorial |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:28 | Predominant | What is your article titled? |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:26 | thedilab_ | I see, i guess I will just have to wait |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:25 | Predominant | That depends entirely on how much free time our wonderful vontuneers have |
# | Aug 26th 2010, 09:24 | thedilab_ | I wonder how long it takes to get my articles approved in Bakery |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 16:11 | PhpNut | cool, I activated his account today |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:35 | someguy2 | thanks |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:35 | PhpNut | done |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:31 | someguy2 | username is 'someguy' email is: ch5699 at yahoo.co.uk |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:29 | PhpNut | what is your username and email? |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:29 | someguy2 | can you approve me in the bakery google group? |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:29 | PhpNut | hi |
# | Aug 24th 2010, 08:28 | someguy2 | hi |
# | Aug 23rd 2010, 14:59 | misterxavier | hi |
# | Aug 21st 2010, 18:09 | adamsultan7 | ( |
# | Aug 21st 2010, 18:08 | adamsultan7 | Hello |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:17 | PhpNut | BBBThunda: you are active on the list now |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:17 | PhpNut | welcome |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:16 | BBBThunda | Predominant, PhpNut, thanks for your help |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:16 | Predominant | BBBThunda: Looking forward to reading your thoughts on the group :) |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:16 | Predominant | I'm calling it a night. Somehow it got to the wrong side of 1am again |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:15 | Predominant | Short answer: No :) |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:14 | Predominant | It begins to feel like we're demanding work out of volunteers, and I'd hate to ive that impression |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:14 | Predominant | BBBThunda: When volunteers are driving the efforts, sometimes its hard to set a deadline. |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:14 | BBBThunda | has a timeline been set up for the rewrite? |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:12 | Predominant | Discussion is somewhat light at the moment, but please don't let that discourage you |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:11 | Predominant | BBBThunda: We'd be interested in any comments, ideas etc you have |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:11 | BBBThunda | ah, ok |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:11 | Predominant | Thats the best place to start discussion if you want an alternative to IRC |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:10 | Predominant | BBBThunda: There is also a google group available here: http://groups.google.com/group/cakephp-bakery |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:08 | PhpNut | you are welcome to join the development team for the rewrite if you like |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:07 | PhpNut | this channel is for discussing the rewrite of the bakery that is taking place |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:06 | PhpNut | no |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:06 | BBBThunda | regarding comment spam? |
# | Aug 18th 2010, 10:05 | BBBThunda | Is there a discussion on the site somewhere? |