Page 12 of 134, showing 100 records out of 13,394 total, starting on record 1,101, ending on 1,200
| # | Username | Text | |
|---|---|---|---|
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:27 | savant | yes |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:27 | Section58 | well you mentioned it was being redone ? |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:27 | savant | i dont think you should worry for much longer |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:27 | savant | concerning authentication etc |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:26 | savant | well since there is some activity around the bakery |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:26 | Section58 | but as you know me, i thought i could get away with it :) |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:26 | Section58 | i know this situation is normally a no |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:26 | Section58 | hence this email change thing |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:26 | Section58 | then yes.. but i don't |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:25 | Section58 | if i knew the password (that doesn't match anything i could think that it could be) |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:24 | ADmad | you can't change it from your account page ? |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:23 | Section58 | D |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:23 | Section58 | may i have my email changed to one that works |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:23 | Section58 | sorry to be a pain, but my email thats set with my bakery account is broken |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:22 | Section58 | hi to not so sexy people |
| # | May 8th 2010, 15:22 | Section58 | hi sexy people |
| # | May 7th 2010, 17:39 | Predominant | hey |
| # | May 7th 2010, 16:03 | jose_zap | yes |
| # | May 7th 2010, 15:39 | nurvzy | Anyone around? |
| # | May 5th 2010, 18:30 | Predominant | burzum: Did you want access to view the existing docs to get up to date? |
| # | May 5th 2010, 15:06 | burzum | ok |
| # | May 5th 2010, 15:02 | PhpNut | I will be back later or talk to Predominant when he shows up |
| # | May 5th 2010, 15:02 | PhpNut | burzum: There is a google doc for it |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:52 | ADmad | i too don't have write access to any other repo besides "cakephp1x" on github |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:51 | ADmad | oh |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:50 | burzum | i dont have write access to the other repo url you posted |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:50 | burzum | oh you mean my link |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:50 | ADmad | hehe then how did you get that link? its not listed here http://github.com/cakephp |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:49 | burzum | neither i can ADmad .( |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:48 | ADmad | *linked |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:48 | ADmad | the one you lined is probably a private repo as i cant access it |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:45 | burzum | because the other repo is empty, ths one here: https://github.com/cakephp/bakery.cakephp.org |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:45 | burzum | PhpNut ^ are we going to refactor this code? |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:43 | ADmad | burzum: http://github.com/cakephp/bakery |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:43 | burzum | this might be more reliable than IRC |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:43 | burzum | can we create a google group for the bakery 2.0 development if there is not already one? |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:42 | burzum | https://github.com/cakephp/bakery.cakephp.org |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:42 | burzum | thanks PhpNut i found it on github, ADmad its github |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:41 | ADmad | burzum: http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki i think now the code is on github and tracker on lighthouse |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:41 | PhpNut | Github |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:40 | ADmad | burzum: the project was created on chaw.com when it was first conceptualized, it has a wiki and some stuff there. |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:39 | burzum | lol, ok ;) |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:39 | ADmad | idk, idk, idk, idk :) |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:39 | burzum | ADmad who is leading the development, whats the status, where is the repo and bug tracker? ;) |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:32 | ADmad | this is the one and only channel for everything related to bakery :) |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:27 | burzum | was this the channel that is also used for bakery 2.0 development? |
| # | May 5th 2010, 14:26 | burzum | hi |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:13 | Alevsk | thanks Predominant |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:13 | Alevsk | ha thanks for the information, im goint to join in the channel |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:13 | Predominant | The best place to ask for help is in #cakephp |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:11 | Alevsk | haa first of all thanks for answer me :) |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:09 | Predominant | Maybe someone else will |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:09 | Predominant | You can speak spanish. But I won't be able to understand it. |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:08 | Alevsk | I have a question, im from Mexico so I speak spanish, can I speak spanish in this chat or only english(my english isnt very good) |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:05 | Predominant | Yes |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:04 | Alevsk | hello everbody, is somebody connected? |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 23:01 | Alevsk | is the english the oficial languaje? |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 21:42 | logart00 | Fatal error: Call to undefined method File::getAssociated() in /usr/local/cake/console/libs/tasks/test.php on line 311 |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 21:42 | logart00 | I am getting an error during a bake |
| # | May 3rd 2010, 21:41 | logart00 | hello all |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:28 | savant | okay |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:28 | ADmad | savant: no, we are discussing a ticket regardign core |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:26 | jose_zap | maybe It was my fault :P |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:26 | jose_zap | ADmad: haha |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:25 | savant | are you all discussing the bakery? |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:25 | ADmad | i just copied one of the earlier case and modified so i blame you for it :P |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:24 | jose_zap | I think |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:24 | jose_zap | I'll commit the fix |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:24 | ADmad | mine ? |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:23 | jose_zap | The test case has a parenthese in a bad place |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:23 | ADmad | the suspense is killing me :) |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:23 | jose_zap | ADmad: I found why there were some funky thing in requiredField() |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:19 | ADmad | right |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:19 | jose_zap | magic |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:19 | jose_zap | it already does too much maginc |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:18 | ADmad | jose_zap: cool. lets see if he comes up anything else. as long as a field is not incorrect tagged as required i am fine with it. as for adding the required class we should stick to the pessimistic approach we currently have |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:16 | jose_zap | I think the same way |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:15 | ADmad | so there are possible grey areas and i think the code is fine the way it is |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:15 | jose_zap | yeah |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:14 | ADmad | *he should use |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:14 | ADmad | so if user wants to be sure of having the required class he use use the notEmpty rule imo |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:13 | ADmad | hmm yes it does in this case, but there can be other cases like say custom regex where empty is a valid value |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:12 | jose_zap | but allowEmpty does imply it, doesn't it?¡ |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:12 | ADmad | it doesnt add the 'required' class because there is no 'notEmpty' rules |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:12 | jose_zap | no? |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:11 | ADmad | actually no |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:11 | ADmad | right it doesnt fail when it should |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:10 | ADmad | checking |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:10 | jose_zap | well it does not fail in my box |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:10 | jose_zap | it should fail, right? |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:10 | jose_zap | ADmad: try this, in the test you just have made... change allowEmpty => true for allowEmpty => false |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:09 | jose_zap | ok, fine |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:09 | jose_zap | And I'm not that sure becasue debugging the requiredFiled() method I have found some weird things |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:09 | ADmad | i already closed it. We can reopen if needed :) |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:08 | jose_zap | I want to be 100% sure |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:08 | jose_zap | haha |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:08 | jose_zap | I'm still not convinced |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:04 | ADmad | ok so good to close the ticket ? |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:03 | jose_zap | it was the id that was failing |
| # | Apr 30th 2010, 15:03 | jose_zap | it passes |