| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 15:26 |
nurvzy |
ADmad: no worries. =) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 15:25 |
ADmad |
nurvzy: 1) not using config array.. sorry about, that i didnt realize 'test_ipn' is included in data posted by paypal itself |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 15:22 |
nurvzy |
ADmad: kk |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 15:22 |
ADmad |
nurvzy: gimme a min to read your comments |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:29 |
markstory |
there are a few conventions seams in 1.2. We've addressed a several of them in 1.3 |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:25 |
ProLoser|Work |
ah okay |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:22 |
markstory |
at least that's what I remember |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:21 |
markstory |
and was added to fix issues where developers broke the error pages. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:20 |
markstory |
because it didn't originally exist. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:20 |
ProLoser|Work |
meh well that i understand, i was just curious the reason behind it but i suppose it doesn't matter |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:19 |
markstory |
*class |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:19 |
markstory |
CakeErrorController is not a userland file. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:19 |
ProLoser|Work |
cuz it's part of the core, i thought it was more relevent |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:16 |
alkemann |
why are you asking that here? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 12:14 |
ProLoser|Work |
i had a random curious question while digging around the libs: how come the cakeerrorcontroller is named error.php and isn't located in the controllers folder? I mean following ur conventions it seems like it should be, unless this is a method of creating an object out of it? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:40 |
alkemann |
im going home for dinner. laters |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:40 |
alkemann |
goody :) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:38 |
jperras |
I'm working through a couple of them today. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:37 |
jperras |
P |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:37 |
jperras |
it was worse yesterday |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:36 |
alkemann |
a whoppin 23 in queue |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:34 |
alkemann |
) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:26 |
ADmad |
heh |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:25 |
jperras |
let them be annoyed. it's called peer review ;-) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:23 |
ADmad |
many get annoyed when we reject or ask them to make changes/refactor |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:22 |
ADmad |
yup |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:22 |
jperras |
that's why there's a review process |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:22 |
jperras |
people need to realize that the act of writing an article does not entitle you to have it published on the bakery |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:20 |
ADmad |
k.. just wanted to say it was a nice thing to do :) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:20 |
jperras |
Just the ones that offer no intrinsic benefit over any of the existing ones. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:20 |
jperras |
not all of them |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:17 |
ADmad |
jperras: you deleted all those file/image upload plugins/components ? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:11 |
jperras |
deleting the article, that is. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:11 |
jperras |
might have been me |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:06 |
alkemann |
jperras: it was one of the codes from the article u linked |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:02 |
jperras |
alkemann: I don't get your tweet |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:02 |
alkemann |
jperras: whats up? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:02 |
alkemann |
heh that was a joke. mostly just spam that gets deleted without comment |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:01 |
markstory |
not sure. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:00 |
alkemann |
did he post an article describing the features of a new cell phone? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 08:59 |
markstory |
he didn't have the name of the article handy though. |