| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:25 |
jperras |
let them be annoyed. it's called peer review ;-) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:23 |
ADmad |
many get annoyed when we reject or ask them to make changes/refactor |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:22 |
ADmad |
yup |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:22 |
jperras |
that's why there's a review process |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:22 |
jperras |
people need to realize that the act of writing an article does not entitle you to have it published on the bakery |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:20 |
ADmad |
k.. just wanted to say it was a nice thing to do :) |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:20 |
jperras |
Just the ones that offer no intrinsic benefit over any of the existing ones. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:20 |
jperras |
not all of them |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:17 |
ADmad |
jperras: you deleted all those file/image upload plugins/components ? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:11 |
jperras |
deleting the article, that is. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:11 |
jperras |
might have been me |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:06 |
alkemann |
jperras: it was one of the codes from the article u linked |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:02 |
jperras |
alkemann: I don't get your tweet |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:02 |
alkemann |
jperras: whats up? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:02 |
alkemann |
heh that was a joke. mostly just spam that gets deleted without comment |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:01 |
markstory |
not sure. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 09:00 |
alkemann |
did he post an article describing the features of a new cell phone? |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 08:59 |
markstory |
he didn't have the name of the article handy though. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 08:59 |
markstory |
just a heads up. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 08:59 |
markstory |
Someone named Booch was in #cakephp and was in a tizzy because someone deleted a co-workers posting without even a comment. |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 08:58 |
alkemann |
hey |
| # |
Aug 4th 2009, 08:46 |
jperras |
alkemann: yo |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 15:36 |
ADmad |
nurvzy: hi |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:46 |
AD7six |
cool |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:45 |
ADmad |
AD7six: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/feed-aggregator#comment-4739 thx for your help |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:38 |
ADmad |
nay.. i haz copy paste :) |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:38 |
AD7six |
or some equivalent. |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:38 |
AD7six |
"The core team has already started refactoring the session implementation to be more model based" ? |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:36 |
ADmad |
now to come up with a proper statemtn for the comment.. i am pretty bad with natural languages :P |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:34 |
ADmad |
http://code.cakephp.org/commits/view/f52d9c56f0ebf7ae0f799e21eb9b2fb0efb8d78c#highlight :) |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:34 |
AD7six |
not sure. can point to a line in the file though http://code.cakephp.org/source/branches/1.3/cake/libs/cake_session.php |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:33 |
ADmad |
but i cant see that commit on chaw.. gives me unthorized error |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:32 |
ADmad |
hah.. this is what i read https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/3972#comment:7 |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:31 |
AD7six |
the db-specific model |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:31 |
AD7six |
the model if you were thinking of that is in libs/(cake_)session.php |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:30 |
ADmad |
me either.. i vagely remember of reading something in one of the changesets on trac... |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:29 |
AD7six |
don't see it in any branch on code.cakephp |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:29 |
ADmad |
ok.. nvm then |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:28 |
AD7six |
not sure - it would (I think) have been implemented as datasources. there's already a session model (but only used for db sessions) |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:21 |
ADmad |
i want to mention that too if i can find it (assuming i am right) |
| # |
Aug 2nd 2009, 03:21 |
ADmad |
btw i think mark already made a model for handling sesssion table in 1.3 but i cant find it |