Log message #899964

# At Username Text
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:19 alkemann i do not understand what you mean by that
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:19 Phally of course we have one users table, but schema's for two, one example/default for the users plugin and one for the bakery itself (which is app dependent)
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:18 Phally eh, that isn't what i had in mind
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:17 alkemann we certainly will not have both an app and a plugin 'users' table
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:16 alkemann we make the users table in the users plugin the way it should look. we export the needed fields from the existing table. putting profile fields as wanted in an app specific UserProfile model
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:16 Phally i didn't bake the models yet, still they seem to be loaded
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:16 alkemann one of us is confused
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:16 Phally *missing table errors
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:15 Phally i think i know what might be the problem with those fields
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:15 Phally why i/we chose to keep a separated users table which is app dependend
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:14 alkemann what am i looking for?
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:14 Phally ehm yeah, that is well weird
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:14 Phally alkemann: read up :p
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:14 Phally alkemann: http://irc.cakephp.org/logs/link/897885#message897895
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:13 alkemann stupid getting an error saying missing table "conversation" when thats what im trying to create
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:12 alkemann didnt work either..
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:12 Phally the schema needs somework though i figured, since there is no way to see if a message is new
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:11 Phally or something like that, i ran it yesterday
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:11 Phally cake schema run create -path d:\www\bakery\plugins\users\config\sql -name Messaging
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:10 alkemann messaging.php could not be loaded
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:10 alkemann cake schema run update -dry -path d:\www\bakery\plugins\users\config\sql -file messaging.php
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:09 alkemann so we do an whatchamacallem.. convertion
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:09 Phally alkemann: the users table i would use for the plugin would look different from the existing one... i.e. for the plugin i would use a field named 'password' and not 'psword' because it follows Auth conventions
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:07 alkemann thats kinda the whole point of the plugin
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:07 Phally alkemann: it is in our case, since it already exists
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:07 alkemann users table isnt app dependent..
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:07 Phally alkemann: run this: http://thechaw.com/bakery/source/branches/usersplugin/plugins/users/config/sql
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:06 Phally alkemann: low priority, since it is app dependent in our case, however i'm going to include one with the minimal amount of fields
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:05 alkemann Phally: why doesnt the plugin schema include the users table?
# Jul 20th 2009, 03:04 alkemann Phally: Database table conversations for model StartedConversation
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:50 alkemann wow those spams on Gwoo's article was very likely done manually
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:50 Phally perfect, thanks
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:50 alkemann Phally: deleted the empty article and unpublised the spam comment
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:46 alkemann ~logs
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:23 Phally what's up with that article anyway? it has no content?
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:20 Phally on the last page comments 5, 6, 7 and 8 are spam
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:20 Phally holy shit
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:19 Phally spam: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/assetpackager-for-cakephp#comment-4648
# Jul 20th 2009, 02:18 Phally spam: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/the-gift-of-1-2-final#comment-4650
# Jul 20th 2009, 01:18 xkunalx just throwing this out there, if anyone here has an idea: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1738627753
# Jul 19th 2009, 16:16 alkemann good nite