| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:31 |
gwoo |
if you need data from teh Auth component |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:31 |
gwoo |
meaning that the original callbacks have not been used properly |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:31 |
gwoo |
to me that is bad form |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:31 |
gwoo |
Phally: also try to avoid set $this->__controller |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:30 |
gwoo |
in the second case |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:30 |
gwoo |
Phally: use isAuthorized |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:29 |
pointlessjon |
has anyone considered shell tasks as a category for articles? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:29 |
Phally |
gwoo: so i extracted it as a method |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:29 |
Phally |
gwoo: it is called twice |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:28 |
gwoo |
why not just put that code in isAuthorized? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:28 |
gwoo |
Phally: what is the purpose behind the private __check method? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:27 |
candybar |
) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:27 |
Phally |
candybar: oh, ok, very well then, thanks for paying attention though :) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:26 |
candybar |
no, i was having a moment, there is no concern |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:25 |
Phally |
candybar: just the person i was looking for, i heard you shared your concerns regarding the permission system we had planned for the bakery? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:10 |
Phally |
pointlessjon: http://thechaw.com/bakery/source/branches/usersplugin |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:07 |
pointlessjon |
what are you working on Phally? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:07 |
Phally |
... |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:07 |
pointlessjon |
good, get back to work! |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:05 |
Phally |
yes |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:03 |
pointlessjon |
any of you working on any bakery related tasks atm? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:02 |
proloser |
lol no love for techno |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 17:01 |
dennishennen |
techno-geek: I'm new in this channel myself, but I can say the chatter is distracting. You'll end up just getting put in everyone's ignore file and no one will hear you when you have a legit question. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:56 |
proloser |
!log |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:54 |
pointlessjon |
gwoo: totally reasonable. ADmad: with all due respect, you should try and be a little more diplomatic |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:54 |
techno-geek |
well I apologize then. I was just responding to the conversation because I enjoy all of your company. I just wish that ADmad and alkemann wouldn't be riding our cases so much, especially when we are discussing legit topics |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:53 |
gwoo |
there is already plenty of that with the way ADmad and alkemann talk about stuff |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
ADmad |
techno-geek: definetely not to filter out your crap |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
gwoo |
techno-geek: really, we don't need any extra noise here |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
techno-geek |
*thats |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
techno-geek |
whats what the search tool is for |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
gwoo |
techno-geek: and noise |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
gwoo |
techno-geek: logs |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
ADmad |
techno-geek: 1) i am build that way 2) you are spamming the channel |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:52 |
techno-geek |
its not like we are flooding any legit bakery 2.0 conversation right now |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:51 |
techno-geek |
ADmad, why are you such as asshole to everyone? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:51 |
ADmad |
gravyface: techno-geek: when gwoo invited advanced users to this channel, i doubt disscusion of radio channels and music genres here was what he expected in here |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:51 |
gravyface |
We Funk goes from James Brown, to Meters, to Kool Moe Dee, to Beastie Boys, etc. etc. bit o' funk, bit o' hip-hop, rinse, repeat. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:50 |
gravyface |
Its cued, I'll give it a boo later. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:48 |
pointlessjon |
yeah you catch some heavy dubs in the podcasts |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 16:48 |
gravyface |
I was thinking dubs like "King Tubby" dubs. |