| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:38 |
markstory |
yeah |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:38 |
alkemann |
yea that prob makes most sense |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:38 |
markstory |
use scaffolds / faker to fill tables, and build fixtures off it. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:37 |
markstory |
that is something I would be willing to do. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:37 |
markstory |
make test data and generate fixtures. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:37 |
markstory |
could do that. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:37 |
pointlessjon |
fixturize? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:35 |
alkemann |
be easier to just put the data in the table and import fixtures maybe? :) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:35 |
alkemann |
i know. i was just brainstorming.. there could be an api for importing records to fixtures? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:34 |
markstory |
that would imply they are attached to the core. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:33 |
alkemann |
markstory: hmm. records were a bit dull. maybe fixture baking could take advantage of the dummy plugin (or phpfaker vendor) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:33 |
markstory |
ah found it I think. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:32 |
markstory |
I don't see any extra ; in the template. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:30 |
markstory |
wonder where that is coming from. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:29 |
markstory |
doh |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:28 |
alkemann |
markstory: bug on line 6 of fixture templates http://bin.cakephp.org/view/664108134 |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:27 |
markstory |
) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:26 |
Phally |
markstory: dank u wel |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:07 |
markstory |
or cake bake fixture <name> or cake bake fixture all |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:07 |
markstory |
cake bake fixture |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:07 |
markstory |
or tests |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 14:07 |
markstory |
alkemann: there is no shortcut for fixtures. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:56 |
alkemann |
markstory: trying to do F for fixture. it jsut repeats the question.. now i need them tests heh |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:55 |
alkemann |
techno-geek: sisses and non-clairvoiants |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:54 |
alkemann |
great |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:54 |
phishy |
alkemann: it certainly did not suck |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:54 |
alkemann |
phishy: did it not suck? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:53 |
phishy |
soon |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:53 |
ProLoser|Work |
markstory: i got it to work, thanks, however i can't seem to find where in the view.php task you scour the vendors folder before rendering so i could try out copying that code to the project task |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:53 |
phishy |
yo! |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:53 |
alkemann |
phishy: missed the show. when is archive coming up? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:53 |
alkemann |
phishy: hey! |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:53 |
techno-geek |
alkemann, according to markstory docs are for sissies |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:52 |
alkemann |
markstory: so have the docs for the new bake commands somewhere? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:52 |
Phally |
yes, i agree |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:51 |
alkemann |
i was trying to say that it is concievable that all apps will have the same groups, but users should belong to the same group in different apps |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:51 |
Phally |
alkemann: ah thank god |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:50 |
alkemann |
Phally: ehh .. i mean group_id |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:50 |
Phally |
alkemann: groups_users? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:50 |
Phally |
wait whut? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 13:49 |
alkemann |
unless we get word from high on that groups are ok to be more or less hard coded.. but groups_users table needs to be app specific in any case |