| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 03:11 |
Phally |
there was a field named `pos` |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 03:11 |
alkemann |
? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 03:11 |
Phally |
pos i.e., still wondering what it meant |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 03:10 |
alkemann |
i removed some |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:59 |
Phally |
alkemann: (talking about (user_plug_users)) |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:59 |
Phally |
alkemann: hmm looks good, are those the existing fields? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:56 |
alkemann |
Phally: http://thechaw.com/bakery/commits/view/adebd98e05ebee3ee8e4922c68268dc7388bc599#highlight |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:53 |
alkemann |
right, those cant be in the plugin |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:53 |
Phally |
alkemann: yeah exactly |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:52 |
Phally |
alkemann: using Modelbehavior::setUp() can be used to |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:52 |
alkemann |
u mean User hasMany Articles? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:52 |
Phally |
alkemann: it will get the app specific stuff out of the plugin |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:51 |
Phally |
alkemann: well doesn't have to be in lots of places.. before* of the model or something that can call a simple bindWithUser() from the AppModel |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:50 |
alkemann |
good night |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:49 |
pointlessjon |
i gotta sleep - see you guys tomorrow hopefully |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:49 |
alkemann |
Phally: what gain to have it lots of places in controllers instead of model? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:48 |
alkemann |
cake joins different dbconfig tables by default if on same database, but containable doesnt. we cant know about it being on the same db, so maybe just focus on the profile? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:48 |
Phally |
alkemann: how about binding User to the other models on the fly from app to avoid coupling from the plugin to the app? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:47 |
alkemann |
apps needs to work through the user profile i guess, |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:47 |
Phally |
alkemann: what about the associations? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:46 |
alkemann |
so user_profiles, groups, groups_user_profiles in the app and just users in the plugin |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:46 |
Phally |
alkemann: right, the groups are app specific |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:46 |
alkemann |
Phally: and what group user belongs to as well |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:45 |
alkemann |
Phally: i just realized that you put group in the plugin, but it has to be in the app |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:44 |
Phally |
alkemann: present |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:44 |
alkemann |
right |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:43 |
pointlessjon |
and with a flag, the category/classification of the flag could shoot the basic message on the page, with an ability to drill deeper to a detailed description of how to address the issue? |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:43 |
alkemann |
maybe just member and lower and moderator and higher |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:42 |
alkemann |
yea it would make sense to split flags into public, member, moderator |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:42 |
pointlessjon |
that actually makes more sense to me personally |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:41 |
alkemann |
valid points has been made that it is both hard and destructive to do inline markers, so probably will have to be article wide tags |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:41 |
pointlessjon |
containing the flags that may or may not apply / be visible to your user |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:41 |
pointlessjon |
maybe it'd be classier to come up with some sort of sidebar block element, etc. |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:40 |
pointlessjon |
yeah that was good stuff. personally i think what wikipedia does works well - then again, it's kind of in your face |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:38 |
alkemann |
pointlessjon: i could use some feedback on this, both implementation and user interface wise : http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/articles/markers |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:38 |
alkemann |
well some have been agreed upon, but it was written a a suggestion and has been unedited |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:37 |
alkemann |
nah, mostly it is suggestions on it atm |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:36 |
pointlessjon |
or if the wiki was kind settled already |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:36 |
pointlessjon |
yeah, see i wasn't sure if there was some sort of approval process in order to add/edit there |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:35 |
alkemann |
Phally: bing |
| # |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:35 |
alkemann |
gonna have to rewrite it though. i wrote lots of ideas there that was meant to start discussion, but i'll take the silence as agreement and just do it ;) |