# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:38 |
alkemann |
well some have been agreed upon, but it was written a a suggestion and has been unedited |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:37 |
alkemann |
nah, mostly it is suggestions on it atm |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:36 |
pointlessjon |
or if the wiki was kind settled already |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:36 |
pointlessjon |
yeah, see i wasn't sure if there was some sort of approval process in order to add/edit there |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:35 |
alkemann |
Phally: bing |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:35 |
alkemann |
gonna have to rewrite it though. i wrote lots of ideas there that was meant to start discussion, but i'll take the silence as agreement and just do it ;) |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:34 |
alkemann |
glorified secretary :) |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:33 |
pointlessjon |
nice work on the spec, looks like you've been touching a lot of those pages alkemann |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:32 |
pointlessjon |
going to be cool |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:32 |
pointlessjon |
yeah |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:30 |
alkemann |
i like the last part |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:28 |
alkemann |
heh indeed. i stopped math at uni level. that shit was just alien |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:28 |
pointlessjon |
i started reading his link to gaussian distribution and my brain blue-screened |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:27 |
pointlessjon |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/ratings/algorithm/Article_Ranking_Algorithm <-- full article |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:27 |
pointlessjon |
maybe not |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:26 |
pointlessjon |
yeah |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:26 |
pointlessjon |
damn you beat me to it |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:26 |
alkemann |
did u mean http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/ratings/algorithm ? |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:26 |
alkemann |
i saw the twitter, where is the article? |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:25 |
pointlessjon |
i'm interested to see what joel does for the rating algorithms |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:25 |
pointlessjon |
;) |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:25 |
pointlessjon |
oh yeah |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:24 |
alkemann |
on the bright side, you can make sure ur scheme is one of the choices ;) |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:24 |
alkemann |
aye |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:24 |
pointlessjon |
damn am i just creating more work for myself? |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:23 |
alkemann |
pointlessjon: feel free to start working on a code highlighter that doesnt hardcode colours ;) |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:22 |
alkemann |
choice between a few maybe, but allowing css edits would be a security issue maybe, and changing a million variables isnt very friendly |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:22 |
pointlessjon |
i know it helps me to see code colored a particular way |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:21 |
pointlessjon |
right |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:21 |
alkemann |
so people can see the scheme they are used to? |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:21 |
pointlessjon |
for logged in users -- the ability to manage (within reasonable limitations) a custom color theme to be applied when code coloring |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:20 |
pointlessjon |
hey idea i had |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:20 |
pointlessjon |
;) |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:19 |
alkemann |
pointlessjon: dont hit it too hard. those things are flammible |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:16 |
pointlessjon |
? |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:15 |
proloser |
gah stupid jquery |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:15 |
pointlessjon |
just about to hit the hay |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:15 |
pointlessjon |
hey alke |
# |
Jul 17th 2009, 02:11 |
alkemann |
good morning pps |
# |
Jul 16th 2009, 16:53 |
ProLoser|Work |
i'm wondering how high end the level of security is in cakephp, should i put in my own checks for brute force login? |
# |
Jul 16th 2009, 15:24 |
alkemann |
also i assume "keyname" is a slug of sorts? |