| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 16:55 |
ADmad |
some people want to :) just had someone ealier in #cakephp who wanted the same.. guess he didnt check the bakery |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 16:54 |
alkemann |
but why do it? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 16:52 |
ADmad |
alkemann: i believe you still have to use session if you want to persist validation errors across controllers |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 16:47 |
alkemann |
poLK: is this still valid http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/validation-in-another-controller ? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:45 |
_nate_ |
ADmad: you bet, thank *you* ;-) |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:45 |
ADmad |
_nate_: thank you for you time |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:42 |
_nate_ |
cool, thanks |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:42 |
ADmad |
*with you |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:42 |
ADmad |
ok i had a ticket ready (without test case though) just wanted to confirm with out b4 hitting submit :) |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:41 |
_nate_ |
seems legitimate, but I'd like to have a record of it |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:41 |
_nate_ |
ADmad: k, can you put together a test case demonstrating where the behavior is inconsistent and submit it with a ticket? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:41 |
ADmad |
_nate_: the save function checks Model::whitelist if 'fieldList' is not passed.. so this lead to inconsistnet behavior |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:40 |
_nate_ |
let me look |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:40 |
_nate_ |
ADmad: hm |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:39 |
ADmad |
_nate_: why so ? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:39 |
ADmad |
_nate_: a query... the Model::invalidFields functions only looks for whitelist fields in the options passed using 'fieldList' key but ignores Model::whitelist property |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:38 |
_nate_ |
kind of, what's up? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:38 |
ADmad |
_nate_: hi.. got a minute ? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 12:38 |
_nate_ |
ADmad: pong |
| # |
Mar 16th 2009, 03:43 |
alkemann |
jperras: nice feedback on the pending article :) |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 23:30 |
demersus |
Anybody available to answer a cakephp question about php sessions stored in the DB? |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:52 |
ADmad |
time for some beauty sleep :) later guys... |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:45 |
jperras |
feel free to leave comments on the wiki |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:44 |
jperras |
alright, I'm out |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:44 |
jperras |
I dig it |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:43 |
alkemann |
search and timeline on main content, news and tags on side bar. i think that would be clean and could work well |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:42 |
alkemann |
do "hottest" (ie latest) news on front page, but all other hottest on relevant page |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:41 |
jperras |
hm, that could work |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:41 |
alkemann |
but maybe we could have the hottest part on the next page. ie show only hottest helper code after the user has clicked code (and helpers) |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:41 |
jperras |
Watchmen* |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:41 |
jperras |
going to see The Watchment |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:40 |
jperras |
anyways, can't discuss for too long |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:40 |
jperras |
and subtle, to not distract from the main content |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:40 |
jperras |
Article name + section |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:40 |
jperras |
it could be made so that the 'hottest stuff' is very minimal |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:40 |
jperras |
k |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:39 |
alkemann |
yea i dont mean design, i mean information overload |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:39 |
jperras |
well, for one there probably won't be 'boxes'. those are there just as placeholders, but I think the designer will do away with the box-shape-outline |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:38 |
jperras |
ah ok |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:38 |
alkemann |
im talking about reducing the amount of boxes, information or "things" on the front page |
| # |
Mar 14th 2009, 18:38 |
jperras |
it seems so |