| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:56 |
AD7six |
I never like it wehenver a new view class is the answer - can only extend one. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:56 |
alkemann |
so the question is, how do we given the current situation (ie bakery 1.0) welcome the contribution of the concept while dealing with the problems of the presented solution? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:55 |
AD7six |
but maybe I'm thinking too linearly.. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:55 |
jperras |
it should almost be a plugin. perhaps a datasource + custom view |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:55 |
AD7six |
I don't think it's fair or appropriate to say "you should create your own datasource to do that" |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:54 |
jperras |
it's even more obviously a datasource addition since it's highly dbo dependent |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:54 |
alkemann |
right. so he is combining model and view stuff into one component |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:54 |
jperras |
yeah |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:53 |
alkemann |
nm, still earlier in us |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:53 |
_nate_ |
jperras: the logging part, sure |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:53 |
jperras |
_nate_: I agree that query logging isn't perfect as it is now. however, query logging seems to me as a datasource/dbo level operatoin |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:52 |
alkemann |
shouldnt u be out celebrating nate? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:52 |
_nate_ |
well, it's glue |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:52 |
alkemann |
i like the concept of adding it to the debug kit. i dont like posting it as it is, because it continues a widespread overuse of components for stuff that belongs either in model or view level |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:49 |
AD7six |
you'd still need a component for collecting your data to send to the view though (I currently assume) |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:49 |
_nate_ |
yeah, it's definitely a concept |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:49 |
AD7six |
another panel |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:49 |
alkemann |
yes, with bakery2.0 we could have posted it with "good concept but probably wrong implementation"-marker to inspire someone to rewrite it |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
I suggested it be implemented as an extension to debug_kit |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:48 |
_nate_ |
jperras: well, the whole current approach to query logging right now is wrong |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
how do you implement it another way without overriding all your datasources |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:48 |
AD7six |
"I dunno" |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:48 |
jperras |
A component is the wrong choice for that |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:46 |
_nate_ |
yup |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:46 |
AD7six |
_nate_: that one ^ |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:45 |
alkemann |
questionable use, probably bad implementation. |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:45 |
alkemann |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/auto-sql-explain-component |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:45 |
jperras |
the what now? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:44 |
alkemann |
AD7six: have u come to any decission or gotten a second opinion about the SQL explain component? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:44 |
jperras |
thanks |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:44 |
alkemann |
ok, did |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:36 |
jperras |
alkemann: there was an issue the other day with 3 of the same article appearing |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:36 |
jperras |
alkemann: delete them |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:31 |
AD7six |
re (sorta) fixed - authors can delete comments (I think) |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
wiki page saved btw |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:29 |
AD7six |
on the wiki, or with the bakery itself? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:20 |
alkemann |
i was thinking of slug rename problem |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:20 |
alkemann |
AD7six: sure |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:20 |
alkemann |
jperras: two of those LDAP articles u talked about are currently in pending. did u need them there or can i softdelete em? |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:19 |
AD7six |
well, it's misleading. name it "markers"? I'm editing it right now anyway |
| # |
Mar 13th 2009, 12:18 |
alkemann |
admad correctly pointed out that this isnt moderation, but i think of it as moderation tools.. maybe not worth the hassle of rename? |