Log message #581838

# At Username Text
# Mar 11th 2009, 03:29 _nate_ I'm about to go to bed :-)
# Mar 11th 2009, 03:29 _nate_ hey guys
# Mar 11th 2009, 03:28 ADmad morning alkemann
# Mar 11th 2009, 03:28 alkemann good morning
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:11 alkemann A+
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:09 ADmad alkemann: agree
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:06 ADmad ~logs
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:05 ADmad evening guys
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:05 alkemann but back to subject. replies to private messages should be private yes, but they should also be part of the message system and not comments on articles, agreed?
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:03 alkemann heh lots of puns to that one yes
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:03 AD7six )
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:03 AD7six it's the other A team member
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:02 alkemann evening ADmad
# Mar 10th 2009, 14:00 alkemann i see
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:59 AD7six heh - well you're probably familiar enough with the code to know what that page is like - I had to type /index/sort:Comment.id/direction:desc manually.
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:58 alkemann AD7six: no I am not. i guess giving me a delete button would be hazzardous
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:57 AD7six alkemann: you aren't an admin? well that page is rather un-friendly.
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:57 alkemann AD7six: cant see that link
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:48 AD7six I was here: http://bakery.cakephp.org/admin/comments/index/page:5/sort:Comment.id/direction:desc and still paging. :P
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:47 AD7six yeah that sort of thing (I hadn't seen that specific example)
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:46 alkemann AD7six: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/cleaning-up-on-the-fly-model-bindings-and-getting-deep-db-relationships-with-one-sql-query
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:42 AD7six I'll look for an example
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:42 alkemann but the plan is to use the message system for this kind of moderator feedback i beleive
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:38 alkemann regarding answer to mariano?
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:37 AD7six oh that reminds me - the bakery currently allows replies to private messages to be public, we should force the type so they aren't
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:33 alkemann )
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:32 AD7six btw I liked your wtf comment on that (now deleted) articlwe
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:30 alkemann appearently the other "special" people get privileges to post bad stuff on the bakery
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:29 AD7six do de do doooooo
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:28 alkemann yes and special people get special priveleges (sp?) to join the A team ;)
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:27 AD7six I'm special
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:25 alkemann both me and admad push to the main one. why cant you?
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:22 AD7six or rather: my code is in the 2.0.x.x branch of my fork.
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:22 AD7six the plugin is, yes
# Mar 10th 2009, 13:20 alkemann AD7six: u got into the main "fork"?
# Mar 9th 2009, 16:36 alkemann yea headed to bed myself. good nite
# Mar 9th 2009, 16:30 AD7six I think that statement confirms I'm too tired to say anything useful. so nighty night ;).
# Mar 9th 2009, 16:29 AD7six if they're already in the repo you don't need to add them of course.
# Mar 9th 2009, 16:28 AD7six git add tmp/cache/persistent/empty andand .... will ignore your ignore settings
# Mar 9th 2009, 16:28 alkemann but can i get the tmp folders into the git with empty files and then adding ignore?
# Mar 9th 2009, 16:26 alkemann but yea i probably should use less .gitingore files