| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:54 |
AD7six |
I thought the bakery logic (for edits, because that's the only time revisions are important) was user edits (submits a draft ?) moderator approves, previous version either marked as previous or deleted |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:54 |
alkemann |
this way you only access the other versions when you need to |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:53 |
alkemann |
AD7six: u could off course have it all in one table. that would just create a big one.. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:53 |
AD7six |
alkemann: I don't follow why that necessitates 3 tables |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:52 |
alkemann |
AD7six: 3 sets of data. revision table holds previews versions of the article. live table holds current live version, draft table holds users latest edit that has not yet been made live (and will become a revision when a new editition is pushed live) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:52 |
gwoo |
so pages |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:52 |
AD7six |
articles have a status flag for draft, pending, published, rejected |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:51 |
AD7six |
I'm only talking about the data in the db |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:51 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:51 |
AD7six |
gwoo: when you say revision - are you attaching additioanl meaning such as "revisions are visible to others"? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:51 |
gwoo |
and that would be a revision |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:51 |
gwoo |
otherwise its just on hold for moderation |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:51 |
gwoo |
if we are to have true drafts |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:50 |
AD7six |
gwoo: I don't understand what you mean |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:50 |
alkemann |
AD7six: yes. maybe the name is wrong. we are not making drafts. author is publishing it, but we are moderating that publishing |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:50 |
gwoo |
it does not become a revision until its out of draft status |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:50 |
AD7six |
is featured superceeded by the vote up/down logic? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:50 |
gwoo |
AD7six: no |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:49 |
AD7six |
a draft is a revision |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:49 |
AD7six |
what's the difference between a draft and a revision |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:49 |
AD7six |
naturally, I disagree |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:49 |
alkemann |
AD7six: because you are basically "hacking" a revision behavior to fulfill another function. and the publishing of a version gets in the way of having actual revisions |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:48 |
alkemann |
hasnt been a topic yet. but jperras pointed out that it has been very little used. maybe we can just give hottest stuff more realestate now that jperras is making the system better :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:48 |
AD7six |
alkemann: hence I ask about the two behaviors because the book's logic covers both. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:46 |
AD7six |
what about featured - is that not going to be used anymore? |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:45 |
AD7six |
are we missing any tables though, I would expectc for fields to me missed atm. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:44 |
AD7six |
so there's only ever 1 |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:44 |
AD7six |
the act of making as current marks the 'current' revision as previous |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:44 |
AD7six |
the book revision logic is user submits a pending revision (draft), admin marks it as current or rejected. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:44 |
alkemann |
AD7six: how does the book do drafts (ie keep old version online) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:43 |
jperras |
AD7six: I don't think we will have much use for deleting ratings |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:43 |
alkemann |
we may decide against using revision, but we agreed that it was better to create a drafted behavior, than use revision for something it was not intended |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:43 |
AD7six |
maybe not needed, it the bakery got spammed it'd be handy to not delete the info you can use to investigate with |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:42 |
AD7six |
jperras: to be able to remove without deleting a rating. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:42 |
ADmad |
yeah dont think we are gonna approve ratings too |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:42 |
jperras |
what is the 'status' field in the rating supposed to be |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:42 |
ADmad |
heh |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:41 |
AD7six |
ADmad: yes :) |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:41 |
alkemann |
AD7six: revision and drafts are very different creatures |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:41 |
alkemann |
it's not in use cause the code is barely baked. |
| # |
Feb 19th 2009, 13:41 |
ADmad |
AD7six: isnt the ratings table missing a filed for storing the rating ? |