Log message #536529

# At Username Text
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:25 ADmad "only comment titles are visible, must expand to see comment body" not sure i like that..
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:24 AD7six http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/6152/schematicmneatonf4.png next?
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:20 AD7six cool
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:20 alkemann just a matter of what tab they are in i think
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:19 AD7six is there planned to be any logic in the app based on comment types
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:19 alkemann last as in regards to it's siblings
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:19 AD7six ok.
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:19 alkemann no matter who u reply to, your reply is posted last with the original comment as parent
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:18 AD7six and the 1 level deep bit?
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:15 alkemann if u post a new comment it is a root node. if u reply it is a level 2 node
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:15 AD7six what does "Threaded replies, one level deep" mean
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:14 AD7six k
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:14 alkemann AD7six: please read the specc stuff. we have changed the edit moderation system
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:13 AD7six ADmad: pending edit
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:13 ADmad AD7six: do we need a status for page too ? its not as if one page on article will be offline and others not
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:12 alkemann the comment stuff doesnt look like it matches specc
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:11 AD7six so whatelse http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/1732/schematicmneatooc5.png
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:11 alkemann example : http://debuggable.com/posts/google-analytics-php-api-cakephp-model:480f4dd5-b2a4-452a-b4ed-4f3fcbdd56cb
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:11 jperras add in the complexity that I described with permissions, and it's not a very scalable implementation
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:11 ADmad this is a tiny but important feature... dont want ppl to be refering to stale stuff like those printed books
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:10 AD7six good point
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:10 alkemann this tag is not jsut a visual thing on the article page, it removes the article from several other features. like search and front page
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:09 alkemann nope
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:09 AD7six alkemann: to put it another way is there any other kind of big-red-box-or-other effect you're planning on adding
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:09 alkemann they do now. dont see why we should stop that
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:09 jperras because a normal user shouldn't be able to tag an article as deprecated
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:08 AD7six oh I see because users are going to be able to tag things themselves?
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:08 jperras and then need to blacklist tags (or use a pre-defined dropdown of tags) for user input
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:08 alkemann it's just infinitly easier and also more effective to have a boolean in article table
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:08 AD7six how so, or is the concept of tags changing for the bakery
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:08 jperras since you need to take into account the permission system
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:08 jperras AD7six: tags for deprecation can get overly complex
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:07 AD7six what? I don't understand your logic
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:07 AD7six and select articles from article left join articles_tags where tag_id = x is not expensive at all
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:07 alkemann but implement this with tag and all article finds are findByTag
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:07 AD7six alkemann: there has to be a find by tag anyway
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:06 alkemann far from free
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:06 alkemann AD7six: nope. i never get upset about discussions :)
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:06 AD7six and besides how expensive is a join
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:06 AD7six alkemann: where is taht a requirement
# Feb 19th 2009, 13:06 AD7six it was only that - a discussion from my point of view