# |
Feb 18th 2009, 13:54 |
jperras |
two things which bakery does not yet have |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 13:53 |
jperras |
d1rk: you need a very well defined api and test cases for that |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 13:48 |
alkemann |
a what= |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 13:45 |
d1rk |
alkemann: is there something like a continious integration process for bakery2? |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:56 |
d1rk |
alkemann: a combination of all usually implies (at least a little bit of) quality |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:48 |
alkemann |
we can use views for popularity was my point as well |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:48 |
alkemann |
no we want quality measure i meant |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:47 |
jperras |
if all we want is a popularity metric, there's page views and # delicious bookmarks |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:45 |
alkemann |
d1rk: though, it's not good data to use quality. just popularity. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:41 |
d1rk |
but we could fetch the data to make something of it. there is no interaction between users in that scenario |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:41 |
d1rk |
ADmad: it is less community as it is not to communicate with others. It is for personal remember-me list. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:41 |
d1rk |
alkemann: hehe |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:40 |
d1rk |
But that way we could highlight more faved articles and/or higher ranked ones. That makes it possible to create richer content-experience |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:40 |
alkemann |
d1rk: there is lots of stuff on rating in the wiki atm. and jperras has some math degree he wants to use and make some nice formula :p |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:40 |
ADmad |
i personally dont like so much *community* oriented features |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:40 |
d1rk |
right now, all articles are of the same weight. That way, it is almost boring to see a long list. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:39 |
d1rk |
second: it makes it possible to weight articles that makes it easier to display more interesting articles. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:39 |
alkemann |
jperras: sure. there's room :) |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:39 |
d1rk |
the benefits i see most from it are: person has more connection to bakery as he/she starts to customize or saves (more or less) personal data in it. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:38 |
d1rk |
i put it into http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/rfc/random-thoughts |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:38 |
jperras |
I agree that we shouldn't try to jam too much functionality in, but putting it in the wiki can't hurt for now |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:36 |
alkemann |
im not sure i see the strength of favorite over users just bookmarking stuff they like |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:35 |
alkemann |
i dont think we should have too many systems :) |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:33 |
d1rk |
jperras: ok |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:33 |
d1rk |
jperras: i just thought that: if more than x ppl have that article on his/her list, it is more likely to be of interest for other people. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:33 |
jperras |
d1rk: put it in the random thoughts, and in the use cases |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:32 |
jperras |
but the dataset that the bakery will generate will not be anything close to what would be needed to produce any sort of semi-intelligent rec eng. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:32 |
d1rk |
jperras: thank you. Do you think it is enough to put them on the use-case list? Or do i have to explain that further somewhere in the wiki? |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:32 |
jperras |
I think a 'favourites' list is a good idea |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:32 |
d1rk |
jperras: yeah. recommendation is not important right now. But starting to produce data, that can be used for it is important. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:31 |
d1rk |
i find myself looking for articles on bakery for more than 10 times. If i would have them in something like a remember-list i would just login, click that list and have a look over that small list. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:31 |
jperras |
let's put the recommendation engine on th back burner |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:30 |
d1rk |
that way, one could categorize (relevant) content of the bakery for oneself. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:29 |
d1rk |
i think, one could query against most-faved articles so to have another possibility to teaser or highlight articles in a way. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:29 |
d1rk |
i added two use-cases: # bookmark/fav other's articles in personal profile # find bookmarked/faved articles |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:28 |
d1rk |
jperras: ok |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:26 |
jperras |
I don't do that much design, actually ;-) |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:25 |
jperras |
d1rk: a sharp #2 pencil. sometimes with an eraser. |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:25 |
d1rk |
jperras: ok. And what is your design-tool of choice? |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:24 |
jperras |
d1rk: omnigrafle usually, but I've been meaning to try out Balsamiq |
# |
Feb 18th 2009, 12:22 |
ADmad |
hi d1rk |