| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:33 |
gwoo |
jperras: i thought i sent it to you |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:32 |
alkemann |
off course ppl may ha different oppinions than the mods |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:32 |
jperras |
good point. which is also why I'm waiting to do the ranking algorithms until I get the current ranking data |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:29 |
alkemann |
thats paraphrasing a little :) |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:29 |
alkemann |
sure, but as gwoo has pointed out about the current version. since u have to log in to rate. we get few ratings, usually by people that care and have a valid oppinion. |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:27 |
jperras |
however, if the articles are moderated, I'm guessing the ratings will usually be skewed towards the higher numbers |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:27 |
alkemann |
or how ever non hostile you would want to write it if u are nicer than me :p |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:27 |
jperras |
alright, I'll try and fit that in |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:26 |
alkemann |
jperras: btw, if u plan on doing something with ratings in the mock, it would be cool if it included what the ratings meant.. (ie 1 = This is garbage and shouldnt be here. 3 = This is a decent article. 5 = Best article on the subject, articles covering same topic should be removed) |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:26 |
jperras |
cool |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:24 |
alkemann |
jperras: good news is that you may get to make both since we may use the yes/no for behind the scenes moderation |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:23 |
jperras |
alright then, 1-5 it is. |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:23 |
alkemann |
well. anyways. about presidents and bjs.. |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:22 |
alkemann |
i am brutally honest. its a character flaw |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:22 |
jperras |
I've learned that most of the time that intentions are usually honourable. so no worries alkemann |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:21 |
jperras |
since everyone takes them as attacks |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:21 |
jperras |
it's hard to give constructive criticism and opinions on the net |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:21 |
alkemann |
at least im consistent |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 |
jperras |
heh, don't worry about it. My internet filter works quite well ;-) |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 |
gwoo |
jperras: i like 1-5 too |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 |
gwoo |
alkemann: but you always are :P |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 |
gwoo |
haha |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 |
alkemann |
I am a bit socially retarded.. was i terribly rude now? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:19 |
alkemann |
i know. but im passing judgement in so far as that i answered your question with my oppinion :p |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:18 |
jperras |
I'm not trying to pass judgement on one rating system versus another, just get an idea of what is planned |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:18 |
alkemann |
-!+" |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:18 |
alkemann |
with rating u can compare two articles that dont cover the same topic. up/down you compare all articles on how is most popular. we can do that with "views! |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:17 |
alkemann |
i like the public rating of 1-5. articles being editable, you can try to improve it and ppl can rate again. up or down i more a popularity contest than a rating |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 |
jperras |
the two are independent |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 |
alkemann |
yes |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 |
gwoo |
alkemann: then we need the up/down for the "authorities" |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 |
jperras |
alkemann: of course not. but a site having a +1, -1 voting system does not make it digg |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 |
alkemann |
comedy! |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 |
jperras |
alkemann: yeah, I just needed a segueway to hijack the discussion ;-) |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
alkemann |
bakery is not digg |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
jperras |
gwoo: there's always the binomial scheme of "vote up" and "vote down", e.g. +1 and -1 |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
alkemann |
here im not talking about the 1-5, but this behind the scenes publish or not system |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
alkemann |
if you need x amount of points before the article goes public, we could give different power of voting to different user types and for amount of accepted articles |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 |
gwoo |
what else do you suggest? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 |
jperras |
i.e. rating of 1 to 5 stars |