| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 12:33 |
 kevin.pfeifer |
https://select2.org/getting-started/basic-usage |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 12:21 |
paolo.bragagni |
some example somewhere? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 12:13 |
paolo.bragagni |
qhere is select2 |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 11:41 |
info315 |
inoas: true |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 11:24 |
inoas |
missing you on irc.libra.chat |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:58 |
kevin.pfeifer |
select2 or chosen is also a good JS library for that |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:54 |
dereuromark |
select2 for example |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:54 |
dereuromark |
Most autocomplete solutions have that built in, they can set the original field with the ID here. |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:53 |
erwane |
put it in a hidden field, comma separated list. Don't forget to unprotect the hidden field before or FormProtector will warn |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:20 |
paolo.bragagni |
the problem is that I dont know how to put the id (of lingua in this case) in my field so that it can save |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:18 |
paolo.bragagni |
and it shows correctly results in my 'lingue' field |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:17 |
paolo.bragagni |
for examplein my add for libri if I call doAc('lingua_id', 'Lingue' , 'title'); it checks for typing in my lingua_id field and it retrieve the id and the title (of Table Lingue) |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:13 |
paolo.bragagni |
my js works and it query with part of field |
| # |
Jul 5th 2021, 09:13 |
paolo.bragagni |
Hi in my add view I'd like to make an autocomplete for related fields (via js) |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:52 |
me1367 |
Yea.. though we'll see... I hope it'll be a relatively small one though... Mainly considering that the amount of big changes in CakePHP 7.4 and 8.0 is not too big... |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:49 |
kevin.pfeifer |
the fact that cake 5 will require php 8.0 will definitely be more cumbersome i think |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:49 |
kevin.pfeifer |
well, at least the jump from 3.x to 4.x is not that bad ,:) |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:45 |
me1367 |
Yea, though in all fairness... It's kinda my own fault for still not being on 4.x :^) Procastinating like a champ. |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:44 |
kevin.pfeifer |
the fact that cakephp 2.0 had support till now tells you, that you got enough time to migrate |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:44 |
kevin.pfeifer |
well sure, there is already a 5.0 branch here https://github.com/cakephp/cakephp/tree/5.0 But that doesn't mean, that its comming out next week and that cakephp 3 will be discarded in the next months |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 20:39 |
me1367 |
I'm barely done migrating to CakePHP 4 and 5 is already on it's way :| FML |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 12:36 |
ragnarog_online |
thank you |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 11:35 |
slackebot2 |
out early because the association property isn't marked as dirty, then that functionality would be lost. |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 11:35 |
ndm |
@ragnarog_online Whenever you patch an association property it will be marked as dirty, no matter whether the nested data structure has any changes. It's not a bug, that is the intended behavior so that it is ensured that the ORM saving logic will run on the nested data. There might for example be `beforeSave()` callbacks for the nested data that would modify it, resulting a difference that needs to be saved, if the ORM would bail |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 09:01 |
ragnarog_online |
SaveStrategy = replace |
| # |
Jul 4th 2021, 08:56 |
ragnarog_online |
hello, is this a bug? relations : SalesOrders hasMany SalesOrderBatches SalesOrderBatches hasMany SalesOrderDetails what makes sales_order_batches dirty? |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:40 |
dereuromark |
I had the same thought^^ |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:15 |
kevin.pfeifer |
but thanks anyway for the help :bow: |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:02 |
kevin.pfeifer |
yea, refactoring my whole search logic to the search plugin is on my list |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:02 |
admad |
especially using the filter collections https://github.com/FriendsOfCake/search/tree/master/docs#filter-collection-classes |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:01 |
admad |
might as well look into using foc/search since you are at it. It will make your code very clean. |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:00 |
kevin.pfeifer |
i will do that |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 13:00 |
admad |
remove *everything* related to the request :) |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:59 |
kevin.pfeifer |
but yes, i can remove the request type check |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:58 |
kevin.pfeifer |
well first it was all present in the controller and then i moved all that inside that finder method |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:57 |
admad |
why the hell are you even checking request type in there currently? :) |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:57 |
kevin.pfeifer |
:) |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:57 |
kevin.pfeifer |
seems logical |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:56 |
kevin.pfeifer |
:thinking_face: |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:56 |
admad |
exactly, why should the finder need anything else from the request? |
| # |
Jul 3rd 2021, 12:55 |
kevin.pfeifer |
so then I don’t have the whole request object inside my finder and just use the params |