Log message #4264936

# At Username Text
# Jun 5th 2021, 19:07 etibor the issue is similiar: ```The reason why the error did not occur when you submit the form is because the $_POST variables exist in the server but if you click the page button IE <a href="search?page=2">2</a> the $_POST will gone That's why this occurs Notice (8): Undefined index: to [APP/Controller/Admin/ScheduleController.php, line 257] to fix that change your method to GET```
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:56 kevin.pfeifer so it does happen on page=1 but not on page=2?
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:55 etibor the issue is probably related to a form filter
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:41 etibor after the first post it does render the 30 record
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:40 etibor hm, interestingly it happened when click on the page number
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:26 kevin.pfeifer well does the array change when you go into your template
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:26 etibor so it may passed for the view
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:26 etibor $documents->toArray() shows the 30 record
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:23 kevin.pfeifer `->count()` is the whole query without limit but `$douments->toArray()` is actually the array whicht gets passed to your view
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:23 etibor ```LIMIT 30 OFFSET 30```
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:23 etibor yes you are right @kevin.pfeifer it does got the : ```LIMIT 30 OFFSET 0``` on the first page, while on the second
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:22 kevin.pfeifer otherwise you result object only has one entry in there?
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:20 kevin.pfeifer after doing the `->paginate()` function on your query object it should have the limit inside the `->sql()` function
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:17 etibor thank you @kevin.pfeifer
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:16 etibor $documents->count() returns 1210
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:15 etibor i checked $documents->sql() it does not contain any limit or offset
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:12 kevin.pfeifer when you check the sql query with debugkit does it say limit 30?
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:06 etibor and debug($this->paginate); shows limit 30 record / page
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:05 etibor i dont know whats the reason why pagination return only one record per page, because at the bottom of the page its shows 30 record/page
# Jun 5th 2021, 18:04 etibor Hello everyone
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:47 admad Regardless I approve of the tweet for Linkin Park reference :)
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:43 ndm Not really into crypto either, but yeah, it looks like the game is still on :)
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:42 admad Oh he did another tweet yesterday :,)
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:39 admad @ndm I would like to have BS based "official" skeleton but as we have seen that's not achievable with just template changes.
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:37 admad Not into the crypto scene, the blood bath post Elon shenagins continues?
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:36 ndm People contemplation with self-deletion after checking their bitcoin wallets?
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:35 admad I agree
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:28 kevin.pfeifer looking at https://packagist.org/packages/cakephp/cakephp/stats i wonder what happened last month :thinking_face:
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:03 ndm I know, but the shipped defaults are just for prototyping anyways... I'd personally would've rather seen the framework's userbase increase by giving the kinds the hip stuff.
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:02 kevin.pfeifer not only classes but some DOM changes too I guess
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:02 dereuromark Less easy to move away from again
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:02 dereuromark The idea Was minimal overhead on the default HTML. Bootstrap requires more class adding ootb
# Jun 5th 2021, 15:00 kevin.pfeifer I can imagine that this was definitely not an easy decision back then but as you said it wouldn’t matter that much any more I remember the “old” cake 3 default styling was even more “oldstyle” than the current milligram variant in my opinion :)
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:57 ndm Doesn't really matter anymore now though, that horse is already in a tube of glue. It would've mattered back then, but now, I don't think Bootstrap would attract many new users.
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:55 ndm and foundation, yeah... which is less esoteric, but still not even closely as popular as bootstrap, at least that was the case back then, not sure how it's nowadays.
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:53 kevin.pfeifer you mean miligram as esoteric?
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:52 ndm Still a pity IMHO that CakePHP chose the esoteric frameworks instead... going with Bootstrap would have been way more popular. But that's a different topic I guess.
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:50 ndm Understandable... I was never a fan of the "frontend" pages made with bootstrap to begin with, but for "backends" I don't mind it.
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:47 kevin.pfeifer but I worked with and looked at so many bootstrap pages that I just can’t stand them any more
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:47 kevin.pfeifer im sorry ,:)
# Jun 5th 2021, 14:43 ndm You're welcome... even after learning that you're a bootsrap-ophobe :P