Log message #4261801

# At Username Text
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:45 tyler.adam.lazenby especially since the entity has no data that I am actually checking
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:44 tyler.adam.lazenby I would rather not run through each entity
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:43 tyler.adam.lazenby the issue with the first method is that I can't seem to figure out why when I pass a result set that it throws this error `Policy for Cake\ORM\ResultSet has not been defined.`
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:33 slackebot middleware ( https://book.cakephp.org/authorization/2/en/request-authorization-middleware.html ), or by manually checking the request in your controller, like `$this->Authorization->can($this->request, 'access')`.
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:33 ndm The plugin basically does what you could/would do manually. Generally you basically have two options, you can either use the authorization component's action handling (personally I'm not really a fan of it), which would invoke `can%Action%` on the controller's default model, for example `UserPolicy::canIndex()`, or you can use a request policy (that's what cakedc/auth does), either combined with the request authorization
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:31 tyler.adam.lazenby Just was wondering people's opinions. But I guess that your opinion to use that plugin is just as valid.
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:30 tyler.adam.lazenby I am pretty far into the project and I am not familiar enough with the cakedc/auth plugin to want to impliment it into this one. BUT i will be using it from here on out, because I know it will make things easier
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:30 tyler.adam.lazenby I am guessing role based access control?
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:29 tyler.adam.lazenby ??? I am not sure what those letters mean
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:28 admad cakedc/auth plugin provided a policy for the authoz plugin for RBAC
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:25 tyler.adam.lazenby The irony that the last discussion was about authroization is not lost on me btw
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:23 tyler.adam.lazenby I usually on other methods have it check a single entity and make sure that the user that is trying to request the action is authorized by using a policy. ```$this->Authorization->authorize($entity, 'actionAlias');```
# Apr 23rd 2021, 15:22 tyler.adam.lazenby What is the best way to use the Authorization plugin to limit if somebody can use the index method? I am trying to limit it to roles that are at the administrative level.
# Apr 23rd 2021, 13:44 ndm *cricket noises*
# Apr 23rd 2021, 13:27 mainanthem Hello !
# Apr 23rd 2021, 12:37 admad doh
# Apr 23rd 2021, 12:29 greg138 GROUPS is also reserved as of 8.0.2 https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/keywords.html
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:58 kevin.pfeifer ah, i see
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:38 ndm The other way around, no check on POST as the controller action will not actually run because of PRG of the search component.
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:37 kevin.pfeifer as i understand the problem (to summerize) You have a index function which should have a authorization check on GET but should have a authorization check on POST, right?
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:35 paolo.bragagni or pherhaps I dont understand.. :)
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:34 paolo.bragagni the best for me seems to skipAuthorization when I'll go in production
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:33 paolo.bragagni at least It seems to me :S
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:32 paolo.bragagni @ndm yes I've understand your explaination
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:32 steinkel search is posting to another action then... check @ndm answer
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:32 ndm @paolo.bragagni But you did understand my explanation, didn't you?
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:31 paolo.bragagni when search is fired I have the 'error' and it doesnt go in index()
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:30 steinkel then call `->authorize` in the index action
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:30 paolo.bragagni (authorization)
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:30 paolo.bragagni I dont want to skip auth when I search in index
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:30 paolo.bragagni I need use authorization but Id like that search in index require authorization
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:29 steinkel the exception is there to remind you need to do this or this action could be accessed for any authenticated user
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:28 steinkel @paolo.bragagni if you use Authorization, you need to call at least once to either `->authorize OR ->skipAuthorization`
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:27 steinkel sounds right to me
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:27 kevin.pfeifer or am I wrong? ,:)
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:23 kevin.pfeifer so `skipAuthorization` just tells the plugin that there is no authorization needed for this function
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:20 kevin.pfeifer authentication => who are you? authorization => i know who you are, but are you allowed to do X?
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:19 kevin.pfeifer its just that sometimes people mix up authentication and authorization
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:19 kevin.pfeifer as I understand it `skipAuthorization` just doesn't require the `->authorizte($entity)` function to be called in that function Authentication (which is not the same as authorization) is still required
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:16 paolo.bragagni not really the better idea of the world to call it '"skipping authorization" :)
# Apr 23rd 2021, 11:16 paolo.bragagni hahaha yes