Log message #4228217

# At Username Text
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:44 ricksaccous so
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:44 ricksaccous I think this is nonsensical without showing some code
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:43 ricksaccous the token identifier returns valid but it never redirects after "logging in" , the first identifier I have (form one) redirects fine
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:42 ricksaccous I'm using a custom identifier along with a token identifier
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:42 ricksaccous with using two identifiers in cakephp3
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:42 ricksaccous I'm running into a strange issue
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:41 kailas that was a good way to waste a morning.
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:40 kailas oh shit, nevermind, i’m an idiot. i created a custom getter with the same name..
# Feb 21st 2020, 17:39 kailas is there something special about the name “claims” in cake? i have a field in my record named claims. for some reason if i debug(a), i see that a->claims has a value. however, if i do debug(a->claims), it’s empty? wtf?
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:56 dereuromark ;) all right
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:56 kaliel yeah sure, just want to make my plugin ok with cake 5 :)
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:56 dereuromark ah nevermind, they still normally exist and work in 4.x even still. so all good
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:55 dereuromark @kaliel You could PR them to the cake4 branch of Shim plugin if you miss them and want to make upgrading of existing projects a bit easier.
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:40 ndm @kaliel `symfony/finder` and `symfony/filesystem`
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:39 ndm I mean, technically you don't really _need_ to change anything, keeping things as is won't cause any harm to the Bitbucket repo, but removing the stuff that you don't use surely is advised from a purely organisational point of view.
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:36 ricksaccous that's somewhat how i operate though it is good to get ideas every now and then
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:36 ricksaccous @trash.mail.collector you gotta just do stuff, nothing more necessary, don't fret over small things and just try it and see, the more you take action the easier it is to figure things out for yourself
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:35 kaliel i already asked, but can't remember, what lib do you suggest for replacement of Folder and File API ? (i'll miss them so much)
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:33 trash.mail.collector do I need to make any other changes before an initial commit (this is my first 4.x project -- I apologize for the dumb questions)?
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:29 ndm @trash.mail.collector Sure, why not, unless Bitbucket somehow has support for it, it only serves a function for Github based code hosting.
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:26 ndm Personally I'd also put manual type validation in the method code itself, nothing more annoying then too lax interfaces IMHO :)
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:25 kaliel @ndm thx a lot
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:25 trash.mail.collector I have a new cakephp skeleton app (created using Composer). If I want to add that as an initial commit to a BitBucket repo, should I delete the .github directory?
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:24 ndm @kaliel Check whether your `d` associations target table is actually an instance of your table class, and not an autogenerated model (an instance of `\Cake\ORM\Table`)
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:23 ndm If you mean the actual method signature, they ses, you'd use no typehint there and only put one in the docblock
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:22 kaliel thx @ndm,so i use no type in params ?
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:20 ndm In the `@param` docblock. PHP itself doesn't support union types yet.
# Feb 21st 2020, 16:18 kaliel do you know how to write union types for method params in php ?
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:58 kailas well, the bigger issue is that i’m just not seeing my associated records on the view page for a. in reality i’m actually joining d.x.y. in my result, i don’t see x or y
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:47 neon1024 You can manually join if you’d prefer, but do remember you’ll end up with a primary row for every associated record
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:47 kailas i’m surprised i’ve never had this question before
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:47 kailas weird
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:47 kailas oh, i see
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:46 neon1024 @kailas hasMany are done as a separate query and merged in PHP
# Feb 21st 2020, 15:35 kailas I’m getting a record with a->get($id,[‘contain’=>[‘c’,‘d’,‘e’]); when i look at the sql, i’m not seeing the joins for d and e. if i do a->get($id,[‘contain’=>[‘c’d’,‘e’]); i see no joins at all. feels like something is wrong with my association for d. the association for D is a simple hasMany (a hasMany D). any ideas what to do?
# Feb 21st 2020, 14:31 dereuromark linux
# Feb 21st 2020, 14:29 kaliel @dereuromark Are you using vagrant because your os is windows ?
# Feb 21st 2020, 14:25 dereuromark hehe
# Feb 21st 2020, 14:21 admad Well it says "No error" so just ignore it :P
# Feb 21st 2020, 14:06 javier.villanueva uhm... not my case then, but thanks
# Feb 21st 2020, 14:05 dereuromark in my case it was the local vagrant time wrong, had to restart vagrant