# |
Feb 17th 2020, 21:33 |
FunkadelicRelic |
The idea being, I select a recommendationgroup and it saves all the associated recommendations from that recommendationgroup. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 21:32 |
FunkadelicRelic |
On the add.php for assessments, the default bake gives me a select box for selecting 1 or more recommendations. I'd like this to be a dropdown with the recommendationgroups listed. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 21:31 |
FunkadelicRelic |
A [recommendation] belongs to a [recommendationgroup]. An [assessment] has many [recommendations]. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 21:30 |
FunkadelicRelic |
I have 3 models - [recommendations], [recommendationgroups] and [assessments] |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 21:30 |
FunkadelicRelic |
Hey all - wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction on an issue I'm having. Well actually it's more my lack of understanding more than anything... |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:42 |
jslamka5685 |
k |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:42 |
challgren |
@jslamka5685 nope https://github.com/cakephp/cakephp/blob/master/src/View/View.php#L949 |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:40 |
jslamka5685 |
Is there any way to use the $this->assign() view functionality for array data rather than string data? |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:31 |
thomas078 |
makes sense. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:31 |
thomas078 |
Many thanks! |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:31 |
challgren |
You would need to send Buyer-Id: 12345, 123456 |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:31 |
challgren |
No multiple headers are not allowed unless you use a comma between the values |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:31 |
thomas078 |
wrong approach? |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:31 |
thomas078 |
So, what does that mean? :) |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:28 |
challgren |
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.2 |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:28 |
slackebot |
in which header fields with the same field-name are received is therefore significant to the interpretation of the combined field value, and thus a proxy MUST NOT change the order of these field values when a message is forwarded” |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:28 |
challgren |
“Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]. It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one “field-name: field-value” pair, without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each separated by a comma. The order |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:26 |
thomas078 |
for some reason i only receive the latter |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:26 |
thomas078 |
Buyer-Id: 12345 Buyer-Id: 123456 |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 19:26 |
thomas078 |
not sure if its nginx or php or cake. Im trying to send duplicate http headers. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 18:15 |
kiwi_74 |
@flashios09 ok, cool. Thanks. I'll look into that. Just wanted to see if the answer was already known. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 18:14 |
slackebot |
<flashios09> |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 18:11 |
flashios09 |
@kiwi_74 try and see, the DEBUG KIT timer tab can help you |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 18:01 |
kiwi_74 |
approach. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 18:01 |
kiwi_74 |
Hello everyone. Quick hypothetical question. Would there be any significant performance hit if you called `$this->loadModel(modelName)` for all the models used by a controller in the initialize() function of that controller, rather than in each individual function as needed? I'm just trying to figure out the advantages / disadvantages to each |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:56 |
flashios09 |
`$routes->connect('/Roomtypes/view/:id', ['controller' => 'Roomtypes', 'action' => 'view']);` |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:56 |
flashios09 |
the route inside `routes.php` |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:54 |
slackebot |
$this->response = $result; } return $result; } /** * The view action * * @param \App\Model\Entity\Roomtype $roomtype The roomtype entity. * @return void */ public function view(Roomtype $roomtype) { debug($roomtype); die(); } }``` |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:54 |
slackebot |
'action' => $request->getParam('action'), 'prefix' => $request->getParam('prefix') ?: '', 'plugin' => $request->getParam('plugin'), ]); } /** * @var callable $callable */ $callable = [$this, $request->getParam('action')]; $id = $request->getParam('id'); $pass = $request->getParam('pass'); if ($id) { $Table = |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:54 |
slackebot |
TableRegistry::get($request->getParam('controller')); // you can replace the `get` method with a custom finder or a config option // you can merge the pass or overwrite it, this is just an example $pass[0] = $Table->get($id); } // $result = $callable(...array_values($request->getParam('pass'))); $result = $callable(...array_values($pass)); if ($result instanceof Response) { |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:54 |
slackebot |
* @throws \ReflectionException */ public function invokeAction() { debug("invokeAction"); $request = $this->request; if (!$request) { throw new LogicException('No Request object configured. Cannot invoke action'); } if (!$this->isAction($request->getParam('action'))) { throw new MissingActionException([ 'controller' => $this->name . 'Controller', |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:54 |
flashios09 |
```<?php namespace App\Controller; use App\Controller\AppController; use App\Model\Entity\Roomtype; use Cake\Controller\Exception\MissingActionException; use Cake\ORM\TableRegistry; use LogicException; /** * Roomtypes controller */ class RoomtypesController extends AppController { /** * Dispatches the controller action. Checks that the action * exists and isn't private. * * @return mixed The resulting response. |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:54 |
flashios09 |
@chris301 @dan874 this is how you can have an entity with typehint as a passed param in your action, all you have to do is to play a little bit with the `Controller::invokeAction()` method |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:12 |
neon1024 |
As a Cake controller would get the repository class instance automagically 8) |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:11 |
neon1024 |
Perhaps the grey area is the separation between the repository instance and the entity |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:11 |
neon1024 |
> application providing the model based on what it’s asked for |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:07 |
admad |
what you want could be achieved relatively easily in Cake 4 by overriding Controller::getAction() and Controller::invokeAction() |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:05 |
chris301 |
anyway, i’m clocking off for the day - thanks for your help guys - looks like what we’ve wanted to do isn’t possible |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:05 |
chris301 |
to do what we have seen elsewhere, it wouldn’t be the router doing it - rather the application providing the model based on what it’s asked for. it’s interesting to see the differences between frameworks |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:03 |
admad |
making the router pull out entities is muddling of concerns IMO |
# |
Feb 17th 2020, 17:01 |
chris301 |
we inherited this codebase, along with its problems, and have worked to make it a useable base - we are also behind on versions, due to other complications we’ve had along the way. it’s in the long term plan to update, but that hasn’t happened yet |