| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 11:25 |
 neon1024 |
Wow, chill. |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 11:25 |
admad |
Exactly, so you statement about JWT holds no value |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 11:24 |
neon1024 |
You might claim the same for anything |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 11:24 |
admad |
@neon1024 PHP too isn't too secure if used incorrectly :) |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:46 |
Martin` |
hi :D |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:46 |
conehead |
yes |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:37 |
cakephp183 |
? |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:37 |
cakephp183 |
there/ |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:36 |
cakephp183 |
hello |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:36 |
cakephp183 |
hi |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:11 |
dereuromark |
The readme could also outline this fact a bit more clear, make a PR here. |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:10 |
challgren |
https://github.com/ADmad/cakephp-jwt-auth/issues/86#issuecomment-568723955 Looks like it wont be upgraded to 4 |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:09 |
dereuromark |
Technically, though, they are both not suitable for stateless session management - https://github.com/ADmad/cakephp-jwt-auth/issues/85 The md5 version of password hashing :P |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:09 |
neon1024 |
JWT isn’t supposed to be secure |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:08 |
dereuromark |
if you are using it for auth, you might want to look into Paseto instead (supposed to be secure, compared to jwt) |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:07 |
challgren |
https://book.cakephp.org/authentication/2/en/identifiers.html#jwt-subject |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:06 |
challgren |
I think JWT is in the authentication plugin |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:00 |
spriz |
Great chance to upgrade it :tada: |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 10:00 |
spriz |
Does not seem like it @peppejaripappalardo ;) https://github.com/FriendsOfCake/awesome-cakephp#authentication-and-authorization |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 09:47 |
challgren |
I think namespaceSplit(string $class) |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 09:41 |
val |
Hi, function is used to get the class name stripping the namespace in 3.x? |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 09:41 |
peppejaripappalardo |
Hello to everybody, someone know if cakephp 4 support the plugin admad jwt? |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 09:25 |
challgren |
Maybe setup your tests to be a bit more smaller |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:47 |
conehead |
Or lets say...most associations were used by behaviors...and you are able to remove those on the fly |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:44 |
conehead |
at least for plain functional tests I only need to load the fixtures that are actually used |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:44 |
conehead |
I take back everything I said. Bad setup of tests and tables |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:24 |
challgren |
Ouch |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:21 |
conehead |
So freaking 40 lines every time. I even extended the cake test file to load these fixtures. But this is a real bad solution imho |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:20 |
conehead |
Yeh, have had a look. Unfortunately random errors showed up for me. Additionally I want to prevent loading all fixtures at all. It is always roughly a total of 40 fixtures I have to load |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:18 |
challgren |
@conehead did you look at https://github.com/FriendsOfCake/fixturize you still gotta put the fixtures in but it doesnt take as long to setup/teardown |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:10 |
conehead |
Oh and I ment I have to load all fixtures and create all tables. Instead of loading 11 fixtures I would prefer to load only 1 fixture (which I actually need) |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:03 |
conehead |
And actually I am not willing to recreate all these tables although I do not need them. Yes, time should not matter when testing. But I prefer to add quite a lot of tests and run them regularly |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 08:02 |
conehead |
Is there a way to remove associations? I would like to test a behavior on a given table. This table has about 10 associations. Now every time I run the tests, I have to create all 11 tests, although I just want to create an entity just with an id and a name |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 07:27 |
damiano |
good morning |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 06:46 |
alexdd55976 |
morning |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 05:58 |
itamer |
Hi @markstory - they've got a moodle website that needs to validate against my Cake site. It's more complex than that, but essentially they've said they want LDAP or AzureAD. It'd be much easier if they could just make a REST/API style request. |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 03:03 |
markstory |
oauth2 is another approach that can be differently complex to get going. Knowing more about how the clients need to access the users you have will help in deciding whether or not ldap is a good protocol. |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 03:01 |
markstory |
@itamer Are the other clients desktop/web or mixed clients? |
| # |
Feb 17th 2020, 01:11 |
itamer |
I've got a cake3 site that another site wants to use to authenticate it's users. It's been suggested that LDAP would be good. Has anyone added a layer over their cake database to allow it to be an LDAP server? |
| # |
Feb 16th 2020, 21:58 |
challgren |
@cake_baker yes |
| # |
Feb 16th 2020, 21:44 |
cake_baker |
Is cake 1.3 considered ancient? |