| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 20:51 |
 dereuromark |
;) |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 20:19 |
ndm |
OMG this stupid editor, I hope the people at Slack step on a bunch of legos and catch koala AIDS... |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 20:18 |
ndm |
The docs should probably use the `login` action as an example for allowing unauthenticated requests, not `view` and `index`. |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 20:06 |
rochasmarcelo |
Also you could use https://packagist.org/packages/cakedc/users#dev-9.next |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 20:05 |
rochasmarcelo |
? |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 20:05 |
rochasmarcelo |
Have you followed the documentation pages https://book.cakephp.org/authentication/2/en/index.html%20https://book.cakephp.org/authorization/2/en/index.html |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:59 |
luizcmarin |
any suggestions please? I am researching some guidance, but I am a layman .... |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:46 |
luizcmarin |
authz = "No identity found. You can skip this check by configuring require Identity to be false." :triumph::,( |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:16 |
luizcmarin |
Hmmm ... installed. Thank you |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:14 |
admad |
You need to use 2.x-dev |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:13 |
admad |
There's no 2.0 release yet for authz lib. |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:13 |
luizcmarin |
Simple question (in theory): what do we have to use in cakephp 4.x (updated) for authentication (login / logout)? |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:06 |
slackebot2 |
<luizcmarin> |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:06 |
luizcmarin |
but..... |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 19:05 |
luizcmarin |
thanks you |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 18:53 |
waspinator |
use https://book.cakephp.org/4/en/tutorials-and-examples/blog-auth-example/auth.html |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 18:53 |
waspinator |
@luizcmarin it should still work, but it's deprecated |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 18:45 |
luizcmarin |
https://book.cakephp.org/4/en/tutorials-and-examples/blog-auth-example/auth.html |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 18:44 |
slackebot2 |
<luizcmarin> |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 18:44 |
luizcmarin |
please, this is OK for cake4? (RC2 et all) |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 17:29 |
devito |
Rules show, but validation errors do not although they are set in the entity |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 17:28 |
devito |
how do i get nested validation errors to appear on the form? |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 17:06 |
gianmarxgagliardi |
:it: |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 17:04 |
dereuromark |
:slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:59 |
gianmarxgagliardi |
wroooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:59 |
ndm |
And when you use distinct/group to remove possible duplicates, you might come back to join @dereuromark’s "group by handling" trauma support group :) |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:54 |
ndm |
:tongue: |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:54 |
neon1024 |
Beaten to it! ;) |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:54 |
neon1024 |
I’d use the `notMatching()`.. |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:54 |
ndm |
`$this->DogsCats->Dogs->find('list')->notMatching('DogsCats')` or `$this->DogsCats->Dogs->find('list')->notMatching('Cats')` https://book.cakephp.org/3/en/orm/retrieving-data-and-resultsets.html#using-notmatching |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:39 |
gianmarxgagliardi |
a question: with this method `$this->set('Dogs', $this->DogsCats->Dogs->find('list'));` I take the list of dogs, but if I wanted to take all the dogs except those that were NOT associated with cats in the dogs_cats table, how could I do? here you find the DB ->https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59141547/cakephp-displays-the-id-display-table-name-from-two-different-tables-with-relati |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:27 |
dereuromark |
thats a cool trick @ndm |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:26 |
ndm |
@dereuromark If what you want is a list of distinct summaries ordered by their latest occurrence, then ordering by `MAX(id)` will give you exactly that. |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:16 |
k4t |
is it known problem? |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:16 |
k4t |
Record not found in table "requests" |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:16 |
k4t |
I have problem with debuggit which throws follwoign error: |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:16 |
k4t |
Hello |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 16:12 |
dereuromark |
true. it is still somewhat fuzzy. But most cases it seemed to work this easy way. Well, maybe just dropping the order then - and done with it. thx |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 15:24 |
val |
some queries may return unexpected results when only_full_group_by is disabled, f.ex. `SELECT email, DATE(created) FROM users GROUP BY DATE(created);` - it is not really clear what `email` value is expected - the first user created at the given date? the last user? Often MySQL will pick one user email on Linux but a different email on Windows even when the data in users table is the same. |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 15:12 |
val |
F.ex. if you take a set [1, 'apples'], [2, 'oranges'], [3, 'oranges'], [4, 'apples'] and then group by name you will get ['apples', 'oranges'] and it makes no sense to order by id because 'apples' have ids 1 and 4, 'oranges' have ids 2 and 3. The result of ordering by id can be 'apples', 'oranges' or 'oranges', 'apples' - both correct |
| # |
Dec 4th 2019, 15:09 |
val |
"but how do you explain it working then for mysql here?" - MySQL chooses any value according to the docs |