| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:59 |
 jh |
urgh ... so it is there ... twice? |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:59 |
jh |
https://github.com/dereuromark/cakephp-tools/blob/master/src/Error/ErrorHandler.php#L29-L30 |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:57 |
jh |
can one of you confirm? |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:57 |
jh |
Seems there is old and new code living side by side |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:55 |
jh |
and well.. for 2 hours nothing worked and then I found that commeting out the ErrorHandlerMiddleware reenabled the error handler |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:55 |
jh |
I have created my own error handler to separate 404s |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:54 |
jh |
now that ErrorHandlerMiddleware is in effect https://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/controllers/middleware.html#middleware-in-cakephp |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:54 |
jh |
hm could it be that https://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/development/errors.html is a bit full of lies |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:52 |
this.impetus |
(and FWIW I ought to have thought of that, but I learned cake before they existed and have reasonably recently returned, thanks guys) |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:49 |
this.impetus |
@admad view cells. that's perfect. thanks |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:48 |
this.impetus |
@admad It might really be just the models; there are a lot of HABTM relationships, otherwise it's really amoutns to formatting lines of the database into human-readable components |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:48 |
admad |
view cells |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:48 |
dereuromark |
This is called "dashboard" usually, but still only one controller, just with different data sources behind, e.g. different models fetching/processing data. |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:47 |
admad |
@this.impetus do you really need different controller or just compose a page using data from different models? |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:47 |
this.impetus |
No, interestingly; it's a static document, ultimately—it could have been a word document except for the constraint that it be assembled from a database, the context for that is that this is serving an academic, data-retrieval purpose. |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:46 |
ricksaccous |
I'm guessing you want a bunch of ajax requests? |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:45 |
this.impetus |
(and that's broad, I realize, but a broad answer is all I'm looking for, just a sketch of how cake intends to do this sort of thing) |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:44 |
this.impetus |
Making all those requests from within the document itself feels pretty uncake-like and is certainy unweidly. Any advice on a reasonable way to go about this? |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:43 |
this.impetus |
*it's also the primary focus of the site I'm building) |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:43 |
this.impetus |
Hi guys—I've a question about approach, more than method, here; I'm authoring a page that is supposed to thread together and format requests of about a dozen different controllers (this single page is going to be enormous but it |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:36 |
jbcharron |
yep, that's what I'll do :P Thanks for you help anyway :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:29 |
ricksaccous |
where id = x and slug = x |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:29 |
ricksaccous |
you could easily just delete directly from the join |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:29 |
ricksaccous |
i never really use that method |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:28 |
ricksaccous |
I'm guessing it's just the unorthodox structure that causes unlink to fail but i don't really know |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:26 |
jbcharron |
Yeah. I actually had to migrate the code from join table using TableA and TableB PKs to the slug one, and I tried to figure out a solution allowing me not to change the whole controllers code, which used the link() and unlink() function. And as the link() still worked, I was wondering why the unlink() didn't. But I guess I will have to try out a different solution :P |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:24 |
ricksaccous |
and you could maybe have a flag for latest tag you update in app logic as well, sounds like a pain |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:23 |
ricksaccous |
then you'd achieve the same thing |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:23 |
jbcharron |
yep, that's the idea, a many have many. For example, my ObjectA has 3 versions, I link it with tags (using the slug, so my tags are linked to all the object versions), so if I delete the last version of my object, the versions 1 and 2 of my object don't lose the link to the tags |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:23 |
ricksaccous |
one thing you could do is post/preprocess records from slugs to records if you really want |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:22 |
ricksaccous |
hmmm |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:21 |
ricksaccous |
in this case i don't think joindata makes sense |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:20 |
ricksaccous |
many have many |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:20 |
ricksaccous |
i mean |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:20 |
ricksaccous |
but using both pks you could still say one has many, but i suppose you want to relate them to subsets |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:20 |
ricksaccous |
maybe i'm missing something |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:19 |
ricksaccous |
that seems unecessary |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:15 |
jbcharron |
And so, the versions share the same Tags (which is the purpose of my join table) |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:15 |
jbcharron |
Actually, no :( this is a model containing many versions of the same business object, the versions 1 to N share the same slug |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:09 |
ricksaccous |
are slugs not unique? |
| # |
Sep 12th 2019, 14:09 |
ricksaccous |
how is it a hasMany to TableB |