Log message #4201560

# At Username Text
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:45 neon1024 I see it’s a double conditional!
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:45 neon1024 You could just `return !$managerNotRequired` surely?
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:44 neon1024 When you’re casting it to int above
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:44 neon1024 Plus this seems very odd `return ! $managerNotRequired ? (bool) $value : true;`
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:44 neon1024 Do you have another rule called `custom` ?
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:33 slackebot reason the message is a generic one: `This field cannot be left empty` and the check does not seem to be triggered in the closure. Any ideas what's missing here?
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:33 davorminchorov Hi! I have the following custom validation rule in my table class: ``` $validator->add('assignment_manager_id', 'custom', [ 'rule' => function ($value, $context) { $managerNotRequired = (int) $context['data']['manager_not_required']; return ! $managerNotRequired ? (bool) $value : true; }, 'message' => 'Manager selection is required', ]); ``` For some
# Sep 4th 2019, 13:14 spriz We killed it after figuring out cake query distinct added `GROUP BY` :) :)
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:53 alexdd55976 made my API crash after an update... took me hours to find the problem
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:52 dereuromark :slightly_smiling_face: jepjep
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:51 alexdd55976 `FULL_GROUP_BY` annyoing problem
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:31 javier.villanueva yes, i read this issue, thanks
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:31 javier.villanueva ok
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:31 neon1024 If you happen to use `->group()` or similar
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:30 neon1024 The only thing you might need to change would be the MySQL options if you’re using `FULL_GROUP_BY`
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:29 javier.villanueva @spriz thanks for response. Mysql 8 + Cake 3.8 does not require special changes?
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:23 spriz @javier.villanueva I'd use the most recent stable :+1:
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:11 javier.villanueva there are a recommended mysql version for cakephp 3.8?
# Sep 4th 2019, 11:01 conehead If no duration is set for the configuration, it is infinite?
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:39 spriz Yeah but this is cases where our support roles in our admin/root UI and it affects cutsomers
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:39 neon1024 You could update the permission and write back to the session if you wanted to
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:38 spriz although that is quite rare
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:38 spriz We stored it in session - only troubles are when they change they have to relog or wait until session expires
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:29 neon1024 Can’t really think of any disadvantages to session storage, except perhaps session hijacking or similar
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:23 conehead But caching could be a solution as well
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:22 conehead Would there be any disadvantages to put permissions into the session? Except that user would have to log out/in again when changes occur?
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:22 neon1024 To minimize links which got to a failed Authorize page
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:21 neon1024 Maybe set the cache as 3-5 minutes
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:21 neon1024 So if two users share the same permissions they can both get the same cached navigation
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:21 neon1024 Perhaps cache the generated navigation using a cache key of the composed permissions
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:20 conehead Was just wondering because I got like 20 menu items. And every time I load a page it is checked if the permission exists for each of these elements
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:20 neon1024 My Auth finder does load permissions into the session though
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:19 neon1024 At least then if someone changes someone’s access, my RoleAuthorize class checks the DB. Otherwise they’ll have permissions until they close the browser
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:18 neon1024 I do both
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:13 conehead Right now I still check from database. rbac
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:13 conehead Would you keep user permissions in sessions?
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:03 neon1024 Well any help we can give, do let us know :thumbsup:
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:02 felix.robaglia (just an intern, I have a lot to learn hehe)
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:02 felix.robaglia It is a tinyint indeed, didn't know I could use a boolean but that makes sense actually. Would make the code clearer, thanks :slightly_smiling_face:
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:00 neon1024 If it’s a `TINYINT(1)` you could use a boolean too :slightly_smiling_face:
# Sep 4th 2019, 10:00 felix.robaglia I'm not sure, prolly cause i'm dumb, just tested without quoting and it works :C