| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:38 |
 admad |
well if a record is dirty some field has changed |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:38 |
neon1024 |
..but I’d have to detect changes in the entity and it’s associations |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:37 |
neon1024 |
Perhaps duplicatable would be better as I could set the status |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:36 |
neon1024 |
The specification says that any change generates a new version, which is pending and then gets signed off |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:36 |
admad |
i can confirm duplicatable can handle associations :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:36 |
neon1024 |
Just increment the version and duplicate the whole thing |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:36 |
neon1024 |
I thought it would be easier with Duplicatable |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:35 |
admad |
they are both José, but the author of that version plugin is savant not lorenzo |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:35 |
neon1024 |
Did I? Oh geez, so I did. Apologies José I meant Jose |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:34 |
admad |
you got the wrong Jose :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:34 |
neon1024 |
Any advantages to storing the versions in other tables? Why wouldn’t you just version in the same table? |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:34 |
lorenzo |
I'm not @savant |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:33 |
neon1024 |
Anyone know if @lorenzo https://github.com/josegonzalez/cakephp-version plugins supports associations? Or if I’d need to hook the event and persist the associations manually |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:29 |
slackebot2 |
!awesome |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:29 |
slackebot2 |
Command sent from Slack by neon1024: |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:29 |
neon1024 |
I need to add versioning to a stack in my application. Does anyone have a plugin for this? To detect changes across all associations and then duplicate with incremented version |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:15 |
alexdd55976 |
Authentification with LDAP credentials through the Authentification Component did not work as expected... but a neat workaround helped me getting the result into Authentication Component for further validation :partyparrot: |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 13:00 |
dereuromark |
jep jep, prg etc |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 12:59 |
ricksaccous |
if it doesn't happen successfully they are on the same page but cake magic will allow the errors to show up |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 12:59 |
ricksaccous |
basically i only redirect if the save happens successfully |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:58 |
dereuromark |
The redirect is bad if you work with forms, as you lose the inputted data on form validation. Otherwise also redirecting would not be a too big issue if you want to go that way. |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:43 |
davorminchorov |
ok an else statement without the redirect fixed the issue I had, thanks for the help! |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:39 |
davorminchorov |
Ok so that's the difference compared to how I used to do it in the past projects with Laravel for example, where each action is a different controller method. So should i use an else statement in my case without redirecting? |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:38 |
alexdd55976 |
actually its what is generated through bake on forms |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:37 |
alexdd55976 |
this is pretty much standard |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:36 |
davorminchorov |
Maybe it is because the same action is being used for GET and POST / PUT / DELETE actions |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:34 |
alexdd55976 |
this seems kind of pointless to me |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:33 |
davorminchorov |
that's why I try to redirect the user to the same page |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:33 |
davorminchorov |
@alexdd55976 Yeah but I wanna stop the code from executing further instead of having an else statement |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:25 |
alexdd55976 |
it seems that the user is not authenticated.. maybe there is some need of different wording.. at least for me it seems very confusing |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:24 |
ndm |
*false |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:24 |
ndm |
or that the identity is `fasle`-ish |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:24 |
ndm |
It depends on where exactly the exception is thrown, if it's thrown from the component, then it means that the authentication middleware didn't run, because the `identity` attribute on the request is missing. |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:22 |
alexdd55976 |
oh.. or does it mean: everything works, but user is not authenticated? |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:21 |
alexdd55976 |
@ndm i do this ` $this->loadComponent("Authentication.Authentication");` but get the message `Authentication is required to continue` |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:18 |
alexdd55976 |
so, actually you are already there |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:18 |
slackebot2 |
self-containing. As mentioned, `$this->Authentication` refers to the authentication component, it's initialized via `Controller::loadComponent()`. https://book.cakephp.org/authentication/1.1/en/index.html#authentication-component |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:18 |
ndm |
@alexdd55976 `$request` comes from wherever it is intended to come from depending on the context where your code runs, in a middleware it's passed to the `__invoke()` method, in controllers and views there's the `getRequest()` method, in components you can retrieve it via the the controller that the component is attached to... The examples in the documentation often rely a bit on a certain familiarity with the framework, and aren't neccesarily |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:18 |
alexdd55976 |
if you do no submitting to a different action, you stay in that action |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:16 |
davorminchorov |
hmm, that's a good point, did not think of it. What's a good way to get back on the same page? |
| # |
Aug 29th 2019, 11:15 |
alexdd55976 |
why you redirect? isn't that clearing the variables? |