# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:17 |
neon1024 |
The second image I linked, has it underlined |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:17 |
ricksaccous |
not in the actual Question entity |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:17 |
ricksaccous |
but that's join data |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:17 |
ricksaccous |
i see sort order is accessible in _joinData |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:17 |
graziel |
i use phpstorm and its ok in there |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:17 |
neon1024 |
I highlighted it :slightly_smiling_face: |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:16 |
ricksaccous |
@neon1024 what's accessible in Question? |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:16 |
neon1024 |
@graziel Are there choices? :O |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:16 |
neon1024 |
@graziel You don’t like the Xdebug `var_dump` theme? |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:16 |
alexdd55976 |
@admad to literaly see whats in it.. yeah.. but is it not possible to show it? this is very general quesion, i know |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:15 |
graziel |
ewww light theme |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:14 |
neon1024 |
I don’t *really* want to expand the association |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:14 |
neon1024 |
@ricksaccous I also can’t seem to add `FormsQuestions` to my `associated` array in `patchEntity` as it’s just a `through` table |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:14 |
admad |
@alexdd55976 them use json_encode() or var_dump() |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:13 |
slackebot2 |
<neon1024> |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:12 |
ricksaccous |
if you don't want to that's fine but i'm just curious |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:12 |
ricksaccous |
can you post your request data out of curiosity and the result after patchEntity? |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:11 |
neon1024 |
It feels like there is something tiny I’ve missed |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:11 |
ricksaccous |
so you wouldn't want the id there |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:11 |
ricksaccous |
yeah, that's true |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:11 |
ricksaccous |
oh |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
ricksaccous |
so it's not properly hydrating the entity even with that? |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
neon1024 |
Well as it’s a belongsToMany it’s `replace` strategy |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
neon1024 |
I tried that already and it didn’t change anything |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
ricksaccous |
otherwise it doesn't knwo how to smash the data together |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
ricksaccous |
yeah, it should prob have the id before patchEntity is hit |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
ricksaccous |
oh really |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
neon1024 |
@ricksaccous No no, the resulting associated entity property is not updated |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:10 |
ricksaccous |
i've had to do it before though |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
ricksaccous |
lol |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
ricksaccous |
you could always just set it dirty afterwards, but that's kind of a dirty solution |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
ricksaccous |
it's just not dirty |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
ricksaccous |
in patchEntity, actually you already said it's getting patched |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
neon1024 |
@ricksaccous Plus, the book states this exact scenario works |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
ricksaccous |
are you putting _joinData in associated |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:09 |
ricksaccous |
oh ok |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:08 |
neon1024 |
Because I have already built the entire front-end |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:07 |
ricksaccous |
@neon1024 why not just save directly on the middle table, as a has many |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:07 |
alexdd55976 |
i expected to see false and null in the array... thats it |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:07 |
admad |
@alexdd55976 so? |
# |
Aug 27th 2019, 16:06 |
ricksaccous |
my bad |