# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:58 |
awi |
Thank you very much |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:58 |
awi |
Didnt know the footprint. thats a nice plugin |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:55 |
jeremyharris |
there are a few ways to do that then. like I said you can inject the identity (User) into the behavior, or add a listener that injects it (see muffin/footprint for an example of this) |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:55 |
awi |
reason is, that I run an Rest-API by Cake. And I dont have the luxury of relying on well formed POST-Requests as anyone can connect himself through the API |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:54 |
awi |
I think I want to have it here |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:54 |
awi |
> generally you don’t want to do authorization handling in that layer of the application |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:50 |
jeremyharris |
however, if you must, you can always inject the identity into the behavior from the controller |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:49 |
jeremyharris |
generally you don’t want to do authorization handling in that layer of the application, it makes testing harder and the domain layer shouldn’t be concerned with authorization necessarily. instead, make changes from the outside, e.g. the controller changes a finder (scopes the query) |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:48 |
awi |
Or: Are there reasons not to do it |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:48 |
awi |
I try to build a Behavior checking if someone is authorized to link something associated. All my Information about authorization is in a component. Can I call the Component from the behaviour? |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:45 |
awi |
hi. |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:16 |
ricksaccous |
crazy |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:16 |
ricksaccous |
so i could add the same identifier twice but with different resolvers configured |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:16 |
ricksaccous |
hahahaha |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:16 |
ricksaccous |
i should have talked to you earlier |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:16 |
ricksaccous |
welp |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:15 |
jeremyharris |
yup they do |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:15 |
ricksaccous |
lmao |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:15 |
ricksaccous |
because i wouldn't mind not writing this resolver |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:14 |
ricksaccous |
until one returns favorably? |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:14 |
ricksaccous |
oh is that a thing? does it just go through each? |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:14 |
jeremyharris |
or maybe you could add multiple identifiers using different resolvers |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:13 |
jeremyharris |
yeah |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:13 |
ricksaccous |
but across multiple tables i think i need my own resolver |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:13 |
jeremyharris |
ah |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:13 |
ricksaccous |
before i used this plugin |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:13 |
ricksaccous |
no i meant before when i wrote my own Auth |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:12 |
jeremyharris |
you can do that with the ‘finder’ option in the OrmResolver ;) |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:11 |
ricksaccous |
hehe |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:11 |
ricksaccous |
besides username/password |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:11 |
ricksaccous |
I have written my own auth though because i wanted to add a field to the check |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:11 |
ricksaccous |
haha yeah i've been using that |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:10 |
neon1024 |
Oh the middleware? Then I’m out. I’ve only used it once a long time ago in alpha |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:10 |
ricksaccous |
I'm using the new authentication plugin thing |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:10 |
neon1024 |
I wrote an ApiAuth adapter for my api :slightly_smiling_face: |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:10 |
ricksaccous |
but the way the normal authenticator grabs the table info is via a resolver, which works fine right now |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:09 |
ricksaccous |
which will identify against an api/tables |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:09 |
ricksaccous |
yeah i'm writing a custom identifier |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:08 |
ricksaccous |
ohhh |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:08 |
neon1024 |
No idea, sorry. I’ve only ever used Auth adapters, I have no idea what a Resolver is. An auth adapter will be a custom way for the AuthComponent to find and identify users |
# |
Jun 12th 2019, 14:07 |
ricksaccous |
@neon1024 what's an adapter? isn't a resolver the more re-usable solution? |