Log message #4189209

# At Username Text
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:43 neon1024 @ricksaccous I’d probably write my own Auth adapter
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:42 ricksaccous I think the answer is yessssss
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:40 ondrej.nedvidek Hi there ;) ``` Select id, column1, null as column2 from tableA UNION Select id, column1, column2 from tableB ``` Does anybody know how to specify `union` null fields? As example above
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:40 ricksaccous that supports multiple tables
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:40 ricksaccous would the best way to go about that be to write my own resolver
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:40 ricksaccous if i wanted to potentially verify users across multiple tables
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:40 ricksaccous so
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:35 niel45 many thanks
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:35 neon1024 :thumbsup:
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:34 niel45 @neon1024 looks like that fixed it
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:32 niel45 definitely
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:32 neon1024 Might be worth a go
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:31 niel45 err no
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:31 neon1024 niel45, Did you clear your composer cache?
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:27 niel45 nope, that doesn't help
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:26 niel45 I'll try deleting the composer.lock and doing composer install
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:24 niel45 damn. I have no idea why it suddenly stopped working, or how to fix it
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:24 Arckame niel45, composer is ok for me
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:17 niel45 Is anybody else having problems with 'composer update'? It has been failing since yesterday for me, being unable to install cakephp/migrations because it cannot find a matching package for symfony/yaml
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:15 dereuromark nah for session (stateful) this is not a good idea as static
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:15 Arckame @dereuromark yep, but it use session. Not the best way of just codes and labels. using a static function (like with Number or Hash helpers) looks better. but thank you for the advice :)
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:12 dereuromark you can pass down info, see how tinyauth AuthUser does it
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:11 Arckame the helper function is now static... :D
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:11 Arckame it was obvious...
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:11 Arckame ok found...
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:11 Arckame ...
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:09 Arckame Any idea ?
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:09 Arckame As I don't want to have labels store in both helper and component / controller, what can I do ? maintaining a table ? (not sure it's the best way). Is there is a way to a component to access an Helper or for an Helper access an component ?
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:08 Arckame In an online payment application, I know from the bank a return code list and the corresponding labels. As these labels can be used in multiples pages, I created an helper. And because it's in a helper, it's not availble from my controllers. but in the case of an excel extract, the excel file is build in a controller and I can't access the helper.
# Jun 12th 2019, 13:08 Arckame hello
# Jun 12th 2019, 11:12 skor $apiClient = new \GuzzleHttp\Client(); $remoteFile = $apiClient->request(‘GET’, ’http://remotefile/location')->getBody(); return $this->response ->withStringBody((string) $remoteFile) ->withType(‘pdf’) ->withDownload(‘YourFile.pdf’);
# Jun 12th 2019, 11:12 skor ```
# Jun 12th 2019, 11:12 skor ok, figured it out, if this helps anyone:
# Jun 12th 2019, 11:09 conehead Isn't it possible to copy (part of) the headers as well as the body?
# Jun 12th 2019, 11:01 slackebot1 thanks
# Jun 12th 2019, 11:01 skor hey everyone! im downloading a file in cake with guzzle. file is generated by another container in the stack, the “other” container is inaccessible via the public network, its only accessible for my frontend. so, i would like to forward that file directly from the controller with the response, i tried withFile but that checks for a local file, and i would like to avoid saving it, then forwarding it, then having to delete it is there a way?
# Jun 12th 2019, 10:04 neon1024 Thanks for the clarification @edgaras.jan :thumbsup:
# Jun 12th 2019, 10:03 leon ok, thank you!
# Jun 12th 2019, 10:03 edgaras.jan csrf is just random data, security component is hash of fields
# Jun 12th 2019, 09:59 neon1024 Well, the locked fields, obviously if you unlock fields they are omitted I think
# Jun 12th 2019, 09:59 neon1024 I believe so, as the token is a hash of the fields