Log message #4184573

# At Username Text
# Apr 25th 2019, 14:55 Martin` what does `composer outdated` say? is it up2date?
# Apr 25th 2019, 14:54 this.impetus ... same for `composer update cakephp/bake`
# Apr 25th 2019, 14:49 this.impetus well.. `composer require --dev cakephp/bake:~1.0`, which I just copied and pasted from the CookBook admittedly, gives `Nothing to install or update`
# Apr 25th 2019, 14:46 this.impetus Ah. Sorry, if that was in the migration guide I am missing it. Counsel where i can read about achieving that?
# Apr 25th 2019, 14:45 admad You probably need to upgrade bake plugin too
# Apr 25th 2019, 14:45 this.impetus One more—migrated to Cake3.7, added a new table for a HABTM relationship between two models that had already existed. When I run `cake bake all` the console is throwing `Exception: Call to a member function addMany() on null in [<project>/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Core/BasePlugin.php, line 248]`
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:46 this.impetus flawless thanks guys
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:43 cnizzardini I don't like the idea that I had to use a plugin to auto create configs, would've love for it to happen automatically
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:43 admad then run `composer update`
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:43 this.impetus great, tyvm
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:43 admad manually or using `composer require`
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:42 ricksaccous yep
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:42 admad the proper way to update the version constraint for that plugin in composer.json
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:42 ricksaccous remove upgrade restrictions in composer.json
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:41 slackebot it
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:41 this.impetus Hopefully quick an easy question; I'm migrating from cake3.6 to 3.7; the current version of one of my composer-managed plugins isn't compatible with 3.7—I'm actually upgrading because the newer version of this plug-in *is* compatible with 3.7 and has features I want access to. That said, the old version currently installed is blocking the update. Obvs I can just delete it and reinstall, was curious if there was a 'proper' means of doin
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:33 cnizzardini Its not a PHP unit thing, its that our custom config file is not copied over for customer.default.php when composer install is run. I got around this by using the Config File Provider Plugin.
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:23 neon1024 Ahh, they’re all in columns! :face_palm:
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:22 neon1024 Why isn’t firstMatch in this list? I tried editing the doc page, but the one in the repo seems different to what’s on live to me
# Apr 25th 2019, 13:22 neon1024 https://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/core-libraries/collections.html#list-of-methods
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:22 admad App::uses() is just glorified `include()`
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:21 val Hi, has anybody tried to use namespaces in cake 2.x instead of `App::uses()`?
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:14 admad kiwi_14: this might help you https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30241975/how-to-limit-contained-associations-per-record-group
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:05 kiwi_14 So, i have 3 Tables : "Category", "Host" and "Experience". I would like to get 12 max experiences by Category.
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:04 Martin` bad request?
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:03 mrgrimpy And what type of error would you suggest I throw if the request header !== application/json?
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:02 np what is problem?
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:02 Martin` Just drop the question :)
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:01 kiwi_14 Hi, i have a problem with Cake's ORM, is someone available to help ?
# Apr 25th 2019, 12:00 admad @mrgrimpy though i would suggests allowing access to URL without .json extension too but if request had Accept: application/json header. For that you just need to use `$this->request->is('json')` instead of checking for `_ext` param.
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:59 admad welcome
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:58 mrgrimpy Thank you for your help, and for your I18n plugin
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:58 admad :slightly_smiling_face:
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:58 mrgrimpy Already done lol
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:58 mrgrimpy Indeed :slightly_smiling_face:
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:58 admad what i suggested above is easier
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:57 admad while ensuring that no other mapped routes map to your particular action
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:57 admad to do it at routes level you will have to connect connect required routes with `.json` paths without enabling extension parsing
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:55 mrgrimpy I just tought there was a way to handle it at routes level
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:55 mrgrimpy Will do
# Apr 25th 2019, 11:55 mrgrimpy Yes I am