| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 15:00 |
 neon1024 |
There isn’t really a best practise, there are only framework conventions |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:59 |
neon1024 |
Albatros, What is it you’re hoping to find? Perhaps we can just answer the questions |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:58 |
neon1024 |
Yeah 3.2.10 :( |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:58 |
dereuromark |
sandbox etc. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:58 |
dereuromark |
not mine :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:58 |
neon1024 |
I wrote this one, but it’s quite out of date now |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:58 |
neon1024 |
https://github.com/davidyell/Cricketeer |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:58 |
neon1024 |
Hm, perhaps not, or I can’t find them |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:57 |
Albatros |
@dereuromark Thx, but on that link most of "blog" and other projects are outdated and a lot of with 404 error |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:56 |
neon1024 |
Sure thing, I have a few, and I know that @lorenzo and @steinkel have a few. Let me see if I can find some |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:51 |
skie |
Have you tried to use oracle synonyms? That the best way to use multiple schemas in oracle |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:39 |
Albatros |
I do not mean on this tutorial in docu |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:39 |
dereuromark |
Check the awesome list for demo apps. https://github.com/FriendsOfCake/awesome-cakephp |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:38 |
Albatros |
Hi there, is there any free project on the github (CakePhp) which we can see code and "Best practice" or something similair? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:37 |
slackebot2 |
<paul_83uk> |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 14:36 |
paul_83uk |
Hi All, I'm a little lost with how cakephp 3.5+ manages cookies (really do miss the simplicity of the CookieComponent) I simply want to delete a cookie but am not sure how to do it reading through the docs theres very little info about how to manage cookies |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:34 |
ricksaccous |
I'm guessing I have to use 3.13.1, alright awesome |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:34 |
dereuromark |
not too bad I guess |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:34 |
ricksaccous |
how bad would that be? heh |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:34 |
ricksaccous |
@dereuromark i might have to use the one compatible with 3.6 as things are a bit behind here |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:31 |
ricksaccous |
thanks for the plugin ;) |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:31 |
ricksaccous |
beautiful |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:30 |
dereuromark |
the queue got some cool updates recently, we are using it quite heavily for a lot of internal processing, and it is very stable and without any issues so far for 3+ workers in parallel. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:29 |
ricksaccous |
read* |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:29 |
ricksaccous |
awesome i'll ready more into it, this will be a great solution for us |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:28 |
dereuromark |
the nice thing about this: each indiviual fail can be auto-retried e.g. once. and only if that still didnt work someone has to manually intervene. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
dereuromark |
otherwise you need to use apps like mailchimp to process higher amounts without gateway timeouts. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
ricksaccous |
i wonder what the limitations on my gateway are now, but that's pretty nifty |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
ricksaccous |
heh, cool |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
dereuromark |
why not? you can process thousands per hour easily. if your gateway is fine with this. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
ricksaccous |
so that would work fine? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:26 |
dereuromark |
you just sent all 400 as queue tasks to the queue. the workers process them invividually, until queue is empty. depending on how many workers, there could be a few sent in parallel. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:26 |
ricksaccous |
or what would be the optimal way of task creation in this case |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:25 |
ricksaccous |
@dereuromark i was reading into your queue plugin recently and had a question, let's say i wanted to send an email at a time to about 400 recipients, and after every email i'd mark a flag in the db as email sent and move on to the next email, would that just be a case of recursively creating workers until the task is completed? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:15 |
neothermic |
of all the things we've modded, that's not one of them |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:15 |
neothermic |
heh |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:15 |
neon1024 |
..have you modified the session creation? :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:14 |
neon1024 |
Like you think it’s using Memcached, and it’s falling back to File or something |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neon1024 |
Can you see the key in Memcached? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neon1024 |
Your user object that is, perhaps it’s the same in Cake 2 |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neon1024 |
In Cake 3 anything your login method returns is set to the session |