| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:31 |
 ricksaccous |
beautiful |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:30 |
dereuromark |
the queue got some cool updates recently, we are using it quite heavily for a lot of internal processing, and it is very stable and without any issues so far for 3+ workers in parallel. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:29 |
ricksaccous |
read* |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:29 |
ricksaccous |
awesome i'll ready more into it, this will be a great solution for us |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:28 |
dereuromark |
the nice thing about this: each indiviual fail can be auto-retried e.g. once. and only if that still didnt work someone has to manually intervene. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
dereuromark |
otherwise you need to use apps like mailchimp to process higher amounts without gateway timeouts. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
ricksaccous |
i wonder what the limitations on my gateway are now, but that's pretty nifty |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
ricksaccous |
heh, cool |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
dereuromark |
why not? you can process thousands per hour easily. if your gateway is fine with this. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:27 |
ricksaccous |
so that would work fine? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:26 |
dereuromark |
you just sent all 400 as queue tasks to the queue. the workers process them invividually, until queue is empty. depending on how many workers, there could be a few sent in parallel. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:26 |
ricksaccous |
or what would be the optimal way of task creation in this case |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 13:25 |
ricksaccous |
@dereuromark i was reading into your queue plugin recently and had a question, let's say i wanted to send an email at a time to about 400 recipients, and after every email i'd mark a flag in the db as email sent and move on to the next email, would that just be a case of recursively creating workers until the task is completed? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:15 |
neothermic |
of all the things we've modded, that's not one of them |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:15 |
neothermic |
heh |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:15 |
neon1024 |
..have you modified the session creation? :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:14 |
neon1024 |
Like you think it’s using Memcached, and it’s falling back to File or something |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neon1024 |
Can you see the key in Memcached? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neon1024 |
Your user object that is, perhaps it’s the same in Cake 2 |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neon1024 |
In Cake 3 anything your login method returns is set to the session |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:13 |
neothermic |
@neon1024 Narp. Tis not a login method either |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 12:12 |
neon1024 |
@neothermic Do you have debug on? Is your login method collecting too much data, and thus setting a huge object to the session on login? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:59 |
egalles |
thx |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:59 |
egalles |
but maybe you re right when data is variable to use always from single source |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:58 |
egalles |
because I use auth component to get data from other views |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:56 |
neothermic |
Hmm. I ponder why _startSession() is taking 3s+ when I'm using memcache for sessions ¬_¬ |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:53 |
dereuromark |
why not reading always from single source of truth (DB) then for this? sounds simpler and easier. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:51 |
egalles |
in appcontroller? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:51 |
egalles |
function beforeFilter(){ $user = $this->User->field('name', array('User.id' => $this->Session->read('Auth.User.id'))); $this->Session->write('Auth.User', $user); } |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:51 |
egalles |
maybe this way? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:49 |
egalles |
for example, user 1 has 10 tickets if i waste 1 then i want in all site that shows 9 but when i Change of view session does not change and stills show me 10 instead of 9 that is what i have in database, but value is still in session |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:48 |
egalles |
Hi there, I'm having a little problem maybe someone can help me about that, I think that it's a noob problem but I want to resolve it asap. I want to write the component Auth so when I have some data there I can manipulate it. Do you know if I do a Session.write of the object session auth if I can do that? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:26 |
dereuromark |
based on that group/role flag you can also load additional join tables and stuff with custom data per role, whatever. but never have more than one primary users table. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:25 |
dereuromark |
jep, always. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:25 |
lubos |
so you would go with `users` table and admin flag or some group, right? :slightly_smiling_face: that makes sense :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:24 |
dereuromark |
this is usually an anti-pattern for all apps and frameworks :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:24 |
lubos |
and is it possible to use 2 tables for users with same tinyauth config? i mean e.g. `users` and `members` if you see what I mean? |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:24 |
ondrej.nedvidek |
oh I see .. thanks for hint ;) |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:21 |
dereuromark |
but they would still be merged together, as they contain different data, that is not an issue for you. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:20 |
dereuromark |
it would still be the same file, just two sections (top vs bottom), usually. you can use multiple files if you want to, as per docs. |
| # |
Mar 26th 2019, 11:16 |
ondrej.nedvidek |
@dereuromark Hi Mark, I would like to use TinyAuth for frontend and admin. So there will be admin acl.ini and frontend acl.ini. How would you set the config for this? I mean, bootstrap does not seem to be option as I need to load one or other, depends what controllers are called. |