| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:14 |
 cakephp-slack |
Nice! Thnx for the info! |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:10 |
neon1024 |
You can nest prefixes too which is a super handy feature I think 8) |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:10 |
neon1024 |
`Router::prefix('admin', function (RouteBuilder $routes) {` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:10 |
neon1024 |
`Router::scope('/', function (RouteBuilder $routes) { }` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:10 |
neon1024 |
Yep |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:07 |
cakephp-slack |
Do I put my “default” routing in scope(‘/’) and my prefix routing in prefix(‘admin’)? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:06 |
neon1024 |
So when you add an api, you can use the ‘api’ prefix! :) |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:06 |
neon1024 |
Yes, use a prefix |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:03 |
cakephp-slack |
It’s separation of admin and frontend basically |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:02 |
cakephp-slack |
I think I’m trying to use a scope routing for a prefix goal ,:) |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:01 |
neon1024 |
Although it sounds a little XY. What is it you’re trying to achieve? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 14:00 |
neon1024 |
@cakephp-slack I would use a custom routing param for this |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 13:41 |
cakephp-slack |
There has to be a better way right? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 13:41 |
cakephp-slack |
`$this->request->getParams()` does not exist. `$this->request` has some info, closest info is the `_matchedRoute` but I would have to preg_match it or something to get the info. |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 13:37 |
berarma |
You mean ```debug($this->request)``` or ```debug($this->request->getParams())``` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 13:10 |
spriz |
@cakephp-slack did you try `debug($this->params)` ? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 13:07 |
cakephp-slack |
CakePHP 3.7 btw |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 13:06 |
cakephp-slack |
When I’m using multiple scopes in my routing, is there a way of knowing which scope I’m in, in the controller? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 12:35 |
berarma |
@half2me, I meant to use formatResults to load the comments not to filter them. |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 11:42 |
edgaras.jan |
add `group(Comments.article_id)` instead of `limit(1)` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 11:10 |
half2me |
You definitely want to use SQL to sort out the data not PHP :S |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 11:10 |
half2me |
I'm tinking hundreds of thousands of comments... |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 11:09 |
half2me |
@berarma but that loads the entire dataset into memory |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 11:09 |
berarma |
You could use Query::formatResults |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:55 |
half2me |
what is the recommended way to get such an association working? It would be really useful to have this in an association. |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:55 |
half2me |
if I get rid of that `LIMIT 1` it works, but I now get multiple authors returned, and I would have to call a `DISTINCT` as well... |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:54 |
half2me |
But if I want to do a `get($authorId, ['contain' => ['Articles.LatestComment']])` the generated SQL query only returns 1 latest comment because it applies that `limit 1` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:53 |
half2me |
the problem with that is it works for a single Article |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:53 |
half2me |
but because the `join` strategy doesn't work with these, I used the `select` strategy |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:53 |
half2me |
the finder did a `$query->orderAsc('posted_date')->limit(1);` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:52 |
half2me |
what I tried doing is making a `latestComment` association, where I specified a custom `finder` |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:51 |
half2me |
I want to make a hasOne association on Articles, which always returns the last comment posted for that article |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:51 |
half2me |
Suppose you have Authors, Articles, Comments (comments have a posted date) |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:50 |
half2me |
@berarma back to my previous question, I'll explain the scenario I have, which could be a pretty common use case, but I'm unsure of the best way to implement it |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:39 |
dereuromark |
mixing input from URL params as arguments with this seems like a really bad idea. |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:39 |
dereuromark |
I dont like how controller actions are injected here, I would expect only the controller to have the service as attribute. |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:36 |
dakota |
if it was done at a cakefest |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:36 |
dakota |
vaguely. It should be on the youtube channel |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:36 |
dakota |
For users, there is http://github.com/cakedc/users, for mail just use a service like mailgun and for invoicing integrate into something like freshbooks :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:36 |
neon1024 |
Anyone remember the talk that @lorenzo did about implementing a DI container? I’m certain he used https://github.com/lorenzo/piping-bag |
| # |
Mar 15th 2019, 10:34 |
dakota |
because buying random scripts always works so well :,) |