Log message #4169847

# At Username Text
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:50 btx and it would be up to the user to pick one? or should it be programmatically determinable?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:50 ricksaccous i could put technically "valid" data
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:50 ricksaccous basically i could look at one field, and based on the relationships of that field (in the same table) the fk has a chance of being some value, but the relationships between the tables also means the fk could also have other values
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:48 btx how do you know it’s not accurate enough, like what is the inaccuracy?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:47 ricksaccous i don't even know, lol
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:47 btx how would you handle the exceptions otherwise? manual linking?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 ricksaccous and i can make it fairly accurate but not accurate enough
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 btx so , add column (without fk), link data, add fk
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 ricksaccous no i thought about it
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 btx could you add a script that links the field properly
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 ricksaccous yes
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 btx and that other table already exists with data in it?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:46 ricksaccous the data "should" exist
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:45 ricksaccous to another table
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:45 ricksaccous no, i'm adding a column that i also want to attach a foreign key to
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:45 btx aren’t you adding a column for something that doesnt exist yet?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:44 ricksaccous in this scenario maybe c) is the best option?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:44 ricksaccous my choices are a ) junk data b) truncate or i guess c ) column can be nullable (even though it shouldn't)
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:43 ricksaccous before i figured i would just put junk data in it and they would realize it and fix it later or something, but it's prob better to just truncate it
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:43 lubos don't truncate if it is not what you (your next app stage) should do
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 ricksaccous are you sure
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 ricksaccous hey dude, you are truncating x table
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 ricksaccous and want to give a message somehow
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 ricksaccous lol
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 ricksaccous i just don't want another dev to be surprised that the table got truncated
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 btx im sure lots of people don’t - I just don’t have the expertise to know how to safely automate them
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 ricksaccous yeah, we should too at this point
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:42 btx yeah
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:41 btx migrations are some of the most destructive changes you can make
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:41 ricksaccous you run migrations manually?
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:41 btx you’re more trusting than I am I guess
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:41 ricksaccous we'll have to fix that
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:41 ricksaccous we do i think but it's kind of borked
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:40 btx do you have an automated migrations routine? (eg a deployment bot that auto-triggers migrations)
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:40 ricksaccous but i'm still worried about the prospect of half pushing it up for some reason
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:40 ricksaccous now we are not even close to being in production for this, we have no client data for this table
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:39 ricksaccous and it pretty much requires a truncate
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:39 ricksaccous because i'm adding a non-nullable fk to a table
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:39 btx lol
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:39 ricksaccous and halt if they choose no
# Oct 3rd 2018, 14:39 ricksaccous just to say "are you sure you want to run this?"