| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:24 |
 itmpls |
or maybe its 4.0+ that they will be deprecated |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:24 |
itmpls |
is that not true? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:23 |
itmpls |
i thought i heard that mentioned and someone mentioned that was from a cake mailing list discussion |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:22 |
josbeir |
hmm @itmpls where did you get that info ? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:19 |
james.phillips |
public function validationDefault(GeneralValidator $validator) maybe should be validationDefault(\Cake\Validation\Validator $validator) .... |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:18 |
james.phillips |
@camdenbassett (IRC) looks like a namespace issue? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:15 |
itmpls |
so in 3.7+, bootstrap.php and routes.php are deprecated? is there a page that defines/recommends the alternatives? src/Application was it? because I defined that for a plugin but bootstrap() was never called within that |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:00 |
james.phillips |
I cant get the ['CrmAddresses' => ['CrmCountries.country'=> $searchTerm]] to work...prob cos its wrong but I dont know how to write it |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:00 |
slackebot4 |
=> "%$searchTerm%"], ['CrmAddresses.postcode' => $searchTerm], ['CrmAddresses' => ['CrmCountries.country'=> $searchTerm]] ] ]); }); |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 15:00 |
james.phillips |
does anyone know how to check assoicated field via matching? ->matching('CrmAddresses', function($q) use ($searchTerm) { return $q ->andWhere([ 'OR' => [ ['CrmAddresses.addr1 LIKE' => "%$searchTerm%"], ['CrmAddresses.addr2 LIKE' => "%$searchTerm%"], ['CrmAddresses.addr3 LIKE' => "%$searchTerm%"], ['CrmAddresses.addr4 LIKE' => "%$searchTerm%"], ['CrmAddresses.addr5 LIKE' |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:59 |
james.phillips |
@bravo-kernel you know about alt3 swagger rite? ;) |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:57 |
james.phillips |
@bravo-kernel thanks for the followup |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:55 |
camdenbassett |
If anyone's interested in looking at the code for my custom validator here it is. https://thepasteb.in/p/vghOPYo0m1li3 . Luckily it's just putting out a warning and not stopping the site completely, but if anyone knows how to get rid of the warning message that would be great. |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:53 |
rrd564 |
If I do not want to select associated model's fields I use innerJoinWith and not matching. Is there a similar way to for notMatching? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:50 |
bravo-kernel |
I will update the documentation to hopefully prevent this confusion for future users. |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:49 |
bravo-kernel |
Follow-up @james.phillips: even though this was not always requires I think it makes sense that API resources need to be in `routes.php`. JSON API requires a link for all related resources and how would Cake otherwise be able to generate the links to those resources? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:41 |
camdenbassett |
Anyone have experience creating a custom validator which extends the normal validator? The custom validator seems to work, but I keep on getting the message "validationDefault(App\SIDev\Validation\GeneralValidator $validator) should be compatible with Cake\ORM\Table::validationDefault(Cake\Validation\Validator $validator)" |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 14:37 |
camdenbassett |
hello everyone |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 13:59 |
Diego_ |
$this->Auth->setConfig('loginRedirect', $this->referer()); |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 13:56 |
Diego_ |
loginRedirect |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 13:56 |
Diego_ |
$this->Auth->setConfig('autloginRedirecthError', 'link'); ? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 13:47 |
neon1024 |
As I’d kinda like to preserve the redirect url if they’re logged out due to inactivity |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 13:46 |
neon1024 |
Or would I just forward users from the login method? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 13:46 |
neon1024 |
Can I set the Auth loginRedirect dynamically based on the user? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:06 |
neon1024 |
Thanks @josbeir and @admad for helping me rubber duck :duck: |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:05 |
neon1024 |
Yep, that’s sorted it! |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:04 |
josbeir |
^^ |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:03 |
neon1024 |
@josbeir Yeah, you can :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:03 |
neon1024 |
Seems to be a method for it, just missed it! |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:03 |
neon1024 |
https://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/orm/behaviors.html#limiting-or-renaming-exposed-finder-methods |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:02 |
josbeir |
just thinking out loud |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:01 |
josbeir |
that way you can use both scenarios |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:01 |
josbeir |
cant your create the methods you want AND a finder method that calls these methods internally ? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:01 |
neon1024 |
I would prefer to use a behaviour, so I will try that first |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:00 |
josbeir |
trait it |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:00 |
josbeir |
ah right |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:00 |
neon1024 |
I can’t do that from a behaviour |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:00 |
josbeir |
and overriding _dynamicFinder() ? |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:00 |
neon1024 |
Next plan of attack! |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 12:00 |
neon1024 |
So I should be able to map the methods in my behaviour, all to the same method |
| # |
Jul 5th 2018, 11:59 |
neon1024 |
Yeah, using `__call` doesn’t work either. This is because the `callFinder()` method uses `method_exists` on the Table, and then uses the behaviours `hasFinder()` method, before throwing the exception. So the method is never actually called for the `__call` to catch |