| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:06 |
kitcat711 |
like "not before" "must be after" |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:06 |
kitcat711 |
you can by driving for validation based on date |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:05 |
 jeremyharris |
any time! |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:05 |
kitcat711 |
thanks for helping :) |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:04 |
jeremyharris |
:+1: |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:04 |
kitcat711 |
due to my logical process afterward |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:03 |
kitcat711 |
jeremy : dont take any further time on it: i found another good reason to avoid it |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 16:01 |
kitcat711 |
thx |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:59 |
jeremyharris |
gimme a few mins :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:58 |
jeremyharris |
hm I’m going to try and work something up real quick to see if I can figure it out for you |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:58 |
kitcat711 |
taht kills my errors methods :( |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:58 |
kitcat711 |
@jeremy => btw, validation on a boolean for the nested => error [_nested] => The provided value is invalid |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:26 |
bakro.istvan |
@dereuromark I found this: https://api.cakephp.org/3.5/source-class-Cake.ORM.Association.BelongsToMany.html#580-615 but there is no way to pass a conditions array. Is there any other implementation? |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:26 |
jeremyharris |
alright, good luck! |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:25 |
kitcat711 |
thx jeremyharris , I keep trying |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:21 |
kitcat711 |
ok |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:19 |
jeremyharris |
it should be in the context of that nested rule |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:18 |
kitcat711 |
ok, how can I access the 'wihCAF' field which is out of my context at that time? |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:17 |
jeremyharris |
so instead of using addNested, use the `->add()` on line 422 and add your conditions in the rule closure |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:15 |
jeremyharris |
you may need to just re-implement it: https://api.cakephp.org/3.5/source-class-Cake.Validation.Validator.html#402-435 |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:15 |
jeremyharris |
hmm |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:15 |
jeremyharris |
oh I didn’t notice withCAF and caf were two different fields |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:15 |
kitcat711 |
and 'withCaf' is a boolean to inform if we nedd to take 'caf' into account |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:14 |
kitcat711 |
actually the array is 'caf' which exist anyway |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:04 |
adithya |
i don't know whats causing that |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:03 |
adithya |
@ricksaccous thank you, seems to be an issue with server the auth component works when i use bin/cake server but from my nginx setup it's not working |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:02 |
jeremyharris |
if your rule returned `true` when withCAF is false, that means no error. addNested won’t run on it because it’s not an array |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 15:01 |
kitcat711 |
hum, that would return an error if withCAF is false |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:59 |
ricksaccous |
@adithya all controllers extend app controller so you already added auth to all controllers |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:58 |
jeremyharris |
return true if false, false if empty array |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:58 |
jeremyharris |
then the “last” rule should be a custom rule |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:58 |
kitcat711 |
adding it in the $validator will return an error if the value is false |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:58 |
kitcat711 |
the point is: 'caf' can be false and that is not an error neither |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:56 |
jeremyharris |
you’ll have to tweak it to match your conditions, but basically if it fails that rule, it shouldn’t run anymore rules for “caf” including the nested ones |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:55 |
kitcat711 |
ok, willl try the "last rule" option |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:55 |
jeremyharris |
I added a comment for what I was thinking as the first suggestion |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:52 |
kitcat711 |
so I was trying to put the condition on the add nested |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:52 |
jeremyharris |
I think either of the options I suggested would still work. either add a “last to run” rule for the caf field itself, or re-implement the actual addNested logic |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:52 |
kitcat711 |
yes |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:52 |
jeremyharris |
kitcat711 oh I see what you’re doing now, one nested validation has the condition one does not |
| # |
Mar 17th 2018, 14:51 |
jeremyharris |
adithya: add it anywhere you want auth. usually people add it to AppController then “allow” the public pages (security “on” by default) |