| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:54 |
ksandeep_ |
wait i will show you but I know its not fully correct |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:54 |
savant |
Can you show the code you are using? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:53 |
ksandeep_ |
or can say i have two different tree in same table and want to move on branch from one tree to another |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:52 |
ksandeep_ |
do not know properly how to do it |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:51 |
ksandeep_ |
what i want is move my one category from one scope to another. same time all child need to be change with same scope |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:51 |
ksandeep_ |
It not updating lft and rght properly, might be i am doing something wrong |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:48 |
savant |
What do you mean, its not updating properly? |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:41 |
ksandeep_ |
In my case order is not updating properly and also not clear how to update scope id for all child record |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:40 |
ksandeep_ |
how to move records (parent and its child's) from one scope to another |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 05:39 |
ksandeep_ |
Hello friends, I need help in tree behavior with scope attribute |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 01:01 |
savant |
im also new here |
| # |
Mar 15th 2018, 00:03 |
rexb |
new here |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:49 |
 alexmax |
Actually wait, the schema doesn't need the field. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:48 |
generitter |
Anyone know how to limit actions (scaffold.actions) on associated objects for the “view” action? |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:44 |
alexmax |
Is there an easier way? |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:44 |
alexmax |
but instead I have to create a field in the schema, and make sure it's in my form, hidden, and contains a value. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:43 |
alexmax |
I'd love to be able to just pop a validation in the validator that just fires without having to be tied to a specific field. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:39 |
alexmax |
I'm having to create a custom field that contains some bunk value in order for my custom validation to fire. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:23 |
xinobi |
How can i solve this problem in order to serve all within /users/:action ? |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:23 |
xinobi |
I'm using a modeless form validator, I don't know how to put this but I need to serve Users and Teams requests but both are Users so that leaves me with some architecture trouble at the controller/view domain |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:20 |
xinobi |
I've wrote this class https://pastebin.com/fJVuJnvW in order to allow multiple model Authentication and it works quite well |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:12 |
alexmax |
`<input type="hidden" name="pubs" value=""/><div class="checkbox"></div><div class="checkbox"></div><div class="checkbox"></div>` |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:12 |
alexmax |
``` $this->Form->select('pubs', ['x' => 'X', 'y' => 'Y', 'z' => 'Z', ], [ 'multiple' => 'checkbox', ]); ``` |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:10 |
alexmax |
I bet my old version of CakePHP 3.2.9 might be the cause of some of these problems. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:09 |
alexmax |
Great, `multiple => checkbox` doesn't render any checkboxes to the page, only the containing divs. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 18:00 |
meder |
i need to cache on a condition - can i just return false in a lambda fed to ->cache? |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:56 |
alexmax |
I can validate each individual entry, but I have no way to validate all of the fields as a whole because the error has nowhere to go |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:56 |
alexmax |
Ugh, and if I break each selection out into its own checkbox, I now don't have a place to put validation for all five of the checkboxes |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:51 |
alexmax |
I have a bunch of checkboxes that I want to have validation over all of them "at least one", which seems like multiselect checkbox would be perfect for. However, some of these checkboxes need a little smidgen of content after the label. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:50 |
alexmax |
Is it possible to pass per-item templateVars to a checkbox multiselect? |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:50 |
alexmax |
Hrm |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:18 |
alexmax |
I might just novalidate the form |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:17 |
sssd |
validation* |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:17 |
sssd |
can try reportValidity() also to manully run html5 validaion |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:16 |
sssd |
@alexmax try form.checkValidity() to see if form is valid |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:15 |
jeremyharris |
the inputs aren’t siblings, fwiw |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:15 |
jeremyharris |
yeah it works for me just fine in chrome |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:14 |
jeremyharris |
hm I have a checkbox required with a hidden field, let me check it out in chrome |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:13 |
jeremyharris |
interesting. I’m surprised we haven’t heard of that issue yet |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:13 |
alexmax |
It seems like a shortcoming on Chrome's end. Maybe it keeps a list of all 'names' with required, and then hits the hidden field first when it tries to check for it. |
| # |
Mar 14th 2018, 17:12 |
jeremyharris |
(since the hidden field is not `required`) |