| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:13 |
 popperz0r |
any change to set it inside fields? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:13 |
popperz0r |
i can see i have to put it outside |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:13 |
slackebot |
['UnqualifiedLead.id' => 'desc'] ])->where(AuthorizationComponent::getUserAuthorizedLeadAccessCondition($this->Auth->User())['conditions'], AuthorizationComponent::getUserAuthorizedLeadAccessCondition($this->Auth->User())['value_type']) ->andWhere($include_conditions);``` |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:13 |
popperz0r |
``` $unqualified_leads_table = $this->UnqualifiedLead->find('all',[ 'fields' => ['id', 'name', 'user_id', 'User.first_name', 'User.last_name', 'User.full_name' => $this->query()->func()->concat(['first_name', ' ', 'last_name']), 'LeadType.label', 'Email.email', 'Phone.number', 'City.city_name'], 'contain' => ['User', 'Phone', 'Email', 'City', 'Company', 'LeadType'], 'order' => |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:13 |
popperz0r |
can i adjust it to this? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:12 |
jeremyharris |
in 2.x, virtual fields were actual SQL snippets like this, while in 3.x they are simply calculated properties on the entity object |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:11 |
jeremyharris |
``` $query = $this->find() ->select(['full_name' => $this->query()->func()->concat(['first_name', ' ', 'last_name']); ``` |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:10 |
jeremyharris |
something like this: |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:09 |
jeremyharris |
instead, you’ll have to build it as an alias field via the orm |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:09 |
jeremyharris |
you cannot in the class 2.x sense do it the same way. a virtual field on the entity is within PHP and calculated by PHP, and has nothing to do with SQL |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:08 |
popperz0r |
now i need to make a request of a string which should query full_name LIKE '%string%' |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:08 |
popperz0r |
is concats first_name and last_name |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:08 |
popperz0r |
i created a virtual property inside User Entity named full_name |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:07 |
jeremyharris |
perhaps an example of what you’re looking for would help us? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:06 |
popperz0r |
anyone use this? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:06 |
popperz0r |
it is killing me |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:06 |
popperz0r |
im still strugling with virtual properties conditions |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 15:06 |
popperz0r |
hi everyone |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 14:17 |
neon1024 |
Afternoon everyone |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:54 |
savant |
night all |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:46 |
makallio85 |
Thanks for your time! Clarified things for me. |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:46 |
makallio85 |
Okay. Now I get it. |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:46 |
savant |
I think thats an anti-pattern |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:46 |
savant |
I dont like querying the database from within the entity |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:44 |
makallio85 |
Do we mean here by "virtual value", something that does lazyloading or something that processes some other data that entity already has? And that should be considered as antipattern? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:43 |
makallio85 |
Cool. So if i add method getPhoneNumber() to contact that iterates just what entity already holds we are all good here. I just got little bit confused of virtual value => anti pattern thoughts you said. |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:41 |
savant |
accessing data you have access to already - and throwing exceptions when its missing - is good |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:41 |
savant |
querying from the method is bad |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:41 |
makallio85 |
Aaa okay. So you mean, i can have public method in entity, but virtual value is bad pattern? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:40 |
ghoritrilochan |
link: http://shreehariji.com |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:40 |
ghoritrilochan |
my new project in not found css,js,img or other page link? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:40 |
savant |
add a method to your Contact entity that does those “iterations” for you |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:40 |
makallio85 |
So if I want to provide "easy" access to phone number without virtual value and without iterations or conditions on calling side, i should do... eeh what? :) |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:39 |
makallio85 |
Yes |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:39 |
savant |
no extra querying |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:39 |
savant |
so your Contact entities have access to those |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:39 |
makallio85 |
Yes |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:39 |
savant |
CommunicationDetails already has the phone number, right? |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:38 |
savant |
@makallio85 nope |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:38 |
makallio85 |
@savant https://gist.github.com/makallio85/6fc0e11ef52ab2eaa122bd24c58f6cc9 |
| # |
Mar 6th 2018, 12:36 |
nisseni |
savant: will try that. :) |