| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
 savant |
if you want to find only one instance for a related table, do a separate query against that table |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
not joins |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:06 |
savant |
first() only applies to the top-level Table |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:05 |
obinoob |
err: on = one |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:05 |
obinoob |
savant the same happens with users... conceptually it is a collection of things, if I know it will return only on item from the table I can use first() and get the things easier... |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:03 |
savant |
but note: no certificates == your code will break |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:03 |
savant |
there is no way to do what you want to do without defining a new relationship or making a method in the entity that returns the first certificate |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:02 |
savant |
similarly, if there were no results, it would be an array of size zero |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:02 |
savant |
its just a collection of size 1 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:01 |
savant |
you _want_ it to make sense, but its still a collection of things |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:01 |
savant |
the relationship does |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:01 |
savant |
the limit doesnt decide whether its a single or multiple |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 18:00 |
obinoob |
savant yes the relationship is hasMany but it still makes sense since first() === limit => 1, so if it conditions accept 'limit' key I don't see why not return "certificate" object?!? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:58 |
lordyuri92 |
hello |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:55 |
savant |
since the relationship is hasMany |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:55 |
savant |
cant do that |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:55 |
obinoob |
so when printing in view instead $users->certificates[0]->number as opposed to $users->certificates->number |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:54 |
obinoob |
as the query runs separately makes sense I could get an object as within first() etc |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:53 |
savant |
an array index for what |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:53 |
obinoob |
I've used 'limit' => 1 but nope |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:52 |
obinoob |
savant when passing ->contain() optional table (I know that it will exist only one registry matching my rules) instead of getting an array index I would like to know if I can get an object ex: https://pastebin.com/w0jU1Hyb |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:48 |
savant |
what? |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:47 |
obinoob |
any chance of getting an object for only one registry within contain() or find('all', ['contain' => [...]]) I've used 'limit' = 1 but still got an array |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:22 |
inoas |
and a fun weekend! |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 17:21 |
inoas |
have a great evening bakers! |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:58 |
admad |
also checkout `App::shortName(get_class($entity))` |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
rudy1976s |
that's ok that way |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
savant |
probably. |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
savant |
and the last will be the classname |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
savant |
and the first will be the plugin |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
rudy1976s |
ah okay |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
savant |
you can assume that you can split that string by Model\Entity |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
rudy1976s |
I am at that point |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
savant |
since its an entity |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
rudy1976s |
exact |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:56 |
savant |
and that will return the full-namespaced class nam |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:55 |
savant |
get_class($entity) |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:55 |
savant |
err |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:55 |
savant |
https://gist.github.com/jasondmoss/6200807 |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:55 |
rudy1976s |
I try to explain better |
| # |
Mar 2nd 2018, 16:55 |
savant |
but you can do |