Log message #4104700

# At Username Text
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:34 neon1024 Isn’t Krakjoe doing that? Let me check
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:34 neon1024 I haven’t really used Guzzle though! *disclosure
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:34 heke lol, is that a wrapper around curl , it would be first time to hear php support multithread ...
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:34 neon1024 I suppose the thought process boils down to if Cake will be similar to Symfony in providing a way to wire up a number of components. However as Cake is opinionated and RAD I think that’s why it provides it’s own tooling within the framework
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:33 neon1024 Seems to, http://docs.guzzlephp.org/en/stable/quickstart.html#concurrent-requests
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:33 heke jeps query multple at the same time
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:32 neon1024 Pretty certain Guzzle allows for multi request, but let me check
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:32 neon1024 Multi-threading? Is that like multi-curl?
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:32 heke @neon1024 Idk, I see curl as the best, because it provides multithreading , ( in which php sucks )
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:30 dereuromark you didnt before? ;)
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:29 neon1024 Going to try out your IdeHelper plugin @dereuromark :slightly_smiling_face: Looks good
# Dec 19th 2017, 10:25 rchavik i'm calling $this->Number->toReadableSize(100000) but the return value is the format string: "{0,number,#,###.##} KB". where did i screw up?
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:59 neon1024 There are some maintainability concerns, as there was with the phinx/migrations but some libraries are far more established and mature
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:58 neon1024 Why does the core have it’s own Http Client and not just depend on something like Guzzle?
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:51 dereuromark you are free to use whatever templating language you want, the core stays lean and simple however at this time.
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:50 dereuromark that was the scope of my ticket and rfc :slightly_smiling_face: nothing more than that, ever.
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:50 dereuromark for bake it was just common sense to not use php anymore to generate php, its a bad idea to use a non-standard solution for generating code of the same language
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:49 dereuromark no, there is no framework decision, it is a opt-in plugin, thats all
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:49 neon1024 I only put bake in require-dev though
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:48 hmic yes, it's used internally. isn't that enough to make use of it? - it gets installed now by default so just use it :D
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:48 neon1024 No harm in using the plugin for the templating though I suppose. I was just curious if there was a framework choice to use Twig, but I guess not
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:47 neon1024 @hmic Only internally, to sidestep the <% tags. I wasn’t sure if it was going to generate Twig templates as well
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:45 dereuromark you must have misunderstood the issue that lead to twig being used for bake plugin
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:44 dereuromark it will not :slightly_smiling_face:
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:44 hmic neon1024: it's already there, isn't it? bake uses twig now from the discussions here - i did not try recently. but it certainly installed twig via composer update lately
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:41 neon1024 Is there a rough guess as to when Cake will swap over to Twig? I assume in a major 4.x release
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:31 heke idk , autossh has served us well ...
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:29 hmic ssh tunnel is a hack. not more. and btw. if you like your ssh tunnel solution and dont want a proper vpn but ssl "the easy way" - use stunnel instead!
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:28 hmic thing is: it's there, you just need to use it. an ssh tunnel is another dependency and point of failure - not even possible to easily HA the thing. thats why you dont want it. if you want/need vpn between your database host and frontend webservers - go for a full blown solution *with* HA and proper monitoring, why not...
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:26 hmic you do know that this article is 5 years old? *lol* and if your database server is on the other end of a slow and high latency link, you have more problems then just ssl vs. ssh performance :P
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:23 heke why would I have 100+ ssl connections ( Mysql SSL ) between hosts, when I could have just one SSL connection between hosts ( SSL tunnel ).
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:22 heke @hmic some guys like more ssh-tunnel , https://www.percona.com/blog/2013/11/18/mysql-encryption-performance-revisited/ and autossh works just fine in our case ...
# Dec 19th 2017, 09:14 birdy247 morning
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:57 hmic heke: there is nothing to wander about. one is a dirty hack, the other a common and best practice usecase.
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:49 heke I am wanderin which better , mysql through ssl tunnel , or just mysql over ssl ?
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:49 heke @hmic
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:40 hmic if you want to specify them in the config array the keys used are: ssl_key, ssl_cert and ssl_ca, the last being optional
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:37 hmic aro: you can just add the requried ssl options to the connect string (url)
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:36 heke @aro command goes something like this, ssh -fN -L 3320:{ip_addess}:3306 user@subdomain.remote-host.com , I am sure google helps you
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:35 hmic totally different story!
# Dec 19th 2017, 08:35 hmic this is mysql through an ssh tunnel