# |
Dec 14th 2017, 12:36 |
justcharlz |
like redirect to another controller. say redirect to another method but the method is not in the same controller |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 12:35 |
eax |
*justchariz ^ |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 12:35 |
eax |
just_chariz: What do you mean by another controller method? |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 12:34 |
justcharlz |
hello guys. how do I make a flash message appear on anther controller method |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 12:14 |
eax |
list? |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 12:11 |
circ-user-5T6dZ |
list |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:33 |
eax |
Hey folks! Cake3 ORM Question: I have the relation Users hasMany UserTags. I need to run a Query that gets Users who either have a certain UserTag, or no UserTags at all. Can anyone tell me how to do that? Thanks! :) |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:07 |
psantos |
I know the difference |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:07 |
psantos |
I got it. Thanks |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:07 |
neon1024 |
It’s worth knowing! |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:07 |
neon1024 |
There is a difference between `==` and `===` |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:06 |
psantos |
when you say that you is little more strict, what do you mean ? now it looks like this: (add is working) ``` if ($this->request->getParam('prefix') == 'admin') { $this->viewBuilder()->setLayout('admin'); } ``` |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:04 |
psantos |
thanks.. .I was missing this |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:00 |
neon1024 |
If you’re on CakePHP 3.4+ at least |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 11:00 |
neon1024 |
You probably meant `$this->request->getParam('prefix') === 'admin'` |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:59 |
neon1024 |
I mean, that’s how I do it. Although my check of the prefix is a little more strict |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:59 |
neon1024 |
That’s how you do it |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:58 |
slackebot |
'admin') { //$this->layout = 'admin'; $this->viewBuilder()->setLayout('admin'); } ``` any idea ? |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:58 |
psantos |
I need to use a differnt layout for all controller in my admin area with admin prefix... so in all controller I am including this: ``` public function beforeFilter(Event $event) { $this->viewBuilder()->setLayout('admin'); } ``` There is no a way to set this on one place only? I tried this in `beforeFilter()` from AppController.php but does not work: ``` if (isset($this->params['prefix']) andand $this->params['prefix'] == |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:58 |
neon1024 |
Especially if you fall into the black hole of trying to mock a table instance, which then mocks the schema which mocks the connection, and down you gooooo |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:57 |
neon1024 |
Table method can sometimes be frustrating to test as they often rely on the ORM, which is hard to mock |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:56 |
neon1024 |
As you’re not testing the entity |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:56 |
neon1024 |
So in your test you use a generic entity mock |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:55 |
neon1024 |
Which then abstracts away the concrete class instance |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:55 |
neon1024 |
Unless your method requires a specific method in the entity class, you can typehint `EntityInterface` |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:55 |
neon1024 |
The D in SOLID |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:53 |
birdy247 |
:+1: |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:52 |
neon1024 |
Or mock it |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:52 |
neon1024 |
Use `new Entity()` |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:52 |
birdy247 |
i.e. new PaymentOptions([... |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:52 |
birdy247 |
Would it be ok, to use ->get() in my table test to get the entity, or better to setup the entity in the test itself |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:51 |
birdy247 |
@neon1024 I am trying to test a Table method. I pass the table method an entity |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:45 |
birdy247 |
@neon1024 SOLID advice :) |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:31 |
neon1024 |
Follow Chris, https://twitter.com/grmpyprogrammer |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:26 |
neon1024 |
That’s the balance |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:26 |
neon1024 |
But not pre-optimisation! |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:26 |
neon1024 |
Then you start seeing the code smells as you’re creating them, allowing for more pro-active refactoring |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:26 |
neon1024 |
Doing some TDD helps. As it makes you focus on creating smaller more concise methods which do simple things well |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:25 |
neon1024 |
Unit testing is actually really easy, but the problem is that people write terrible code and then have trouble trying to write tests for it. When in fact if writing the unit test is really hard, it’s indicative of a code smell |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:25 |
neon1024 |
It’ll also avoid you drifting into mocking hell, and inadvertently writing integration tests |
# |
Dec 14th 2017, 10:24 |
neon1024 |
Making your unit tests easier to write, your system under test smaller, and your tests more predictable |