Log message #4099386

# At Username Text
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:57 hmic yes
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:57 hmic if the registered but unverified email does not match the facebook one, thats an error and you do not link the accounts but show an error
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:57 prepender hmm so if they register w facebook first I can prompty them to set a password then and there
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:56 hmic if you dont require email on your site, but a username, you can link them up afterwards
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:56 hmic thats what you do, yes.
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:55 prepender well FB recommends merging the 2 accounts if the same email
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:54 hmic if you link to a facebook account, you get their account info back for you to use
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:54 hmic that is what it is.
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:54 hmic if you allow everybody to make an account for any email without verification
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:54 hmic whats your question?
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:53 prepender I should give them access to data from an account w a verified user?
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:53 prepender doesnt mean they are the user
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:53 prepender so anyone can make an account on an email
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:53 hmic so what?
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:51 prepender my website doesnt require verification
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:51 prepender well I mean
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:51 hmic you get the email address back from facebook? - that seems confirmed to me :p
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:48 prepender Question. So in regard to the login flow, FB recommends merging app registered user with fb registered user. But what if users have unconfirmed email addresses on the website? I'm trying to come up with a solid flow here that is most convenient for the user.
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:40 inoas it should be a 1min job
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:40 inoas Martin`: can you take a look?
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:33 inoas neothermic for /both/?
# Nov 29th 2017, 17:33 inoas can you guys help out @ dutch translation ;)?
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:51 neothermic hmmth, I have some patches to write for 2.x and 3.x
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:43 WyriHaximus \o/
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:43 inoas Well you can offer some too ;-) https://gist.github.com/inoas/4efb3687dd91bfc4337ff7bd31800b96 (translations to dutch, 9 strings)
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:41 Martin` i'm not needed anymore? :P
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:41 Martin` hi
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:40 WyriHaximus inoas: cheers, because for a some I kinda need a bit more context =D
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:38 inoas the bottom 2 are for my app, the rest is cakephp/localized
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:37 inoas yes :)
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:37 WyriHaximus inoas: got half way but had some questions, will have a look when I get home. Are you still online in about 30 to 60 minutes?
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:32 inoas WyriHaximus: I guess this got "lost in translation" ... time ;-)
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:26 inoas ceeram, marlinc, Martin` anyone of you dutch guys online :)?
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:01 neothermic and for that I will use the shim, because there's too much to change :)
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:01 hmic use a testcase database/app and "cake bake all" to get a codebase to look at
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:00 neothermic that doesn't mean the 500k SLoC isn't getting updated to 3.x in the future
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:00 dereuromark neothermic: good for you :slightly_smiling_face:
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:00 neothermic just my knowledge needs to be upgraded
# Nov 29th 2017, 16:00 neothermic @dereuromark well, my first strike into 3.x might be a new thing, so I can start afresh without worry about upgrading :)
# Nov 29th 2017, 15:57 hmic it will pay off very quickly and you will not want to go back
# Nov 29th 2017, 15:56 etipaced I’m going through the same process now myself. Been in 2.x for many years and am simply forcing myself to learn 3.x. It does feel like starting over but it’s a necessary step.